ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
68177
|
Tue Nov 3 18:22:33 2015 |
| Nicola | nicolamori@aol.com | Info | Linux | 2.9.2 | WYSIWYG editor for Elog not working in Debian Jessie | I suspect that this might be a Debian packaging issue; however no one replied to my help request on the Debian forums so I try posting the question also here. I insatlled Elog on my Debian Jessie machine, I can open it with a browser but when entering a new post just a simple plain text editing box is shown instead of the WYSIWYG editor, and no drag and drop area for attachments is shown. When I start the elog service with "systemctl start elog" I get this suspect message in the journal: "FCKedit NOT detected". Indeed, I see that the elog installation creates a symlink which I guess is supposed to point to the fckeditor installation, which nevertheless is missing:
root@static-3-080:/usr/share/elog/scripts# ll fckeditor
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 Oct 25 2014 fckeditor -> ../../fckeditor
root@static-3-080:/usr/share/elog/scripts# ll ../../fckeditor
ls: cannot access ../../fckeditor: No such file or directory
Is this a Deban misconfiguration or a bug in Elog? thanks |
Draft
|
Fri Nov 6 15:45:33 2015 |
| Nicola | nicolamori@aol.com | Question | Linux | 2.9.2 | Re: WYSIWYG editor for Elog not working in Debian Jessie | <p>Hi Andreas, I opted for installing FCKeditor rather than Elog, since the debian package, even if outdated and broken, has some goodies like a systemd unit which is very handy for managing the daemon. I found FCKeditor 2.6.11 on SorceForge (after a long search, seems that CKeditor almost made his parent disappear from the web), unpacked it in the proper folder and now when I edit a page I can use the WYSIWYG editor. There are just two minor issues: the first is that no drop area for the attachments is shown (I had it on my old Debian 6 server) and that he toolbar of the editor has an ugly "Windows 95" look. This is a screenshot:</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<table align="center" cellspacing="1" style="border:1px solid #486090; width:98%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="background-color:#486090">Andreas Luedeke wrote:</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="background-color:#FFFFB0">
<div>Hi Nicola,</div>
<div>this appears to be a particular problem of the specific (outdated) ELOG debian package.</div>
<div>But you could just download the FCKeditor directly and install it to the proposed location "/usr/share/fckeditor".</div>
<div>Or you download ELOG 3.1.1 and give it a try to install it with the makefile.</div>
<div>Cheers, Andreas</div>
<table align="center" cellspacing="1" style="border:1px solid #486090; width:98%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="background-color:#486090">Nicola wrote:</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="background-color:#FFFFB0">
<p>I suspect that this might be a Debian packaging issue; however no one replied to my <a href="http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=125320">help request</a> on the Debian forums so I try posting the question also here. I insatlled Elog on my Debian Jessie machine, I can open it with a browser but when entering a new post just a simple plain text editing box is shown instead of the WYSIWYG editor, and no drag and drop area for attachments is shown. When I start the elog service with "systemctl start elog" I get this suspect message in the journal: "FCKedit NOT detected". Indeed, I see that the elog installation creates a symlink which I guess is supposed to point to the fckeditor installation, which nevertheless is missing:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><code>root@static-3-080:/usr/share/elog/scripts# ll fckeditor<br />
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 Oct 25 2014 fckeditor -> ../../fckeditor<br />
root@static-3-080:/usr/share/elog/scripts# ll ../../fckeditor<br />
ls: cannot access ../../fckeditor: No such file or directory</code></p>
</blockquote>
<p>Is this a Deban misconfiguration or a bug in Elog? thanks</p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p> </p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p> </p> |
68181
|
Fri Nov 6 15:52:30 2015 |
| Nicola | nicolamori@aol.com | Question | Linux | 2.9.2 | Re: WYSIWYG editor for Elog not working in Debian Jessie | Hi Andreas, I opted for the first solution since the Debian package, although outdated and broken, has some goodies like a systemd unit for managing the daemon which is very handy. I downloaded FCKeditor 2.6.11 from SourceForge (after a long search, seems that CKeditor made its parent almost disappear from the web), unpacked it in the proper folder and not the WYSIWYG editor works. I have just a couple of minor issues: there is no attachment drop area (I had it in my old Debian 6 server) and the editor toolbar has an ugly "Windows 95" look; see the attached image. I can live with these problems but if the can be easily fixed then obviously I would do that, can you give me any hint? Thank you very much.
Andreas Luedeke wrote: |
Hi Nicola,
this appears to be a particular problem of the specific (outdated) ELOG debian package.
But you could just download the FCKeditor directly and install it to the proposed location "/usr/share/fckeditor".
Or you download ELOG 3.1.1 and give it a try to install it with the makefile.
Cheers, Andreas
Nicola wrote: |
I suspect that this might be a Debian packaging issue; however no one replied to my help request on the Debian forums so I try posting the question also here. I insatlled Elog on my Debian Jessie machine, I can open it with a browser but when entering a new post just a simple plain text editing box is shown instead of the WYSIWYG editor, and no drag and drop area for attachments is shown. When I start the elog service with "systemctl start elog" I get this suspect message in the journal: "FCKedit NOT detected". Indeed, I see that the elog installation creates a symlink which I guess is supposed to point to the fckeditor installation, which nevertheless is missing:
root@static-3-080:/usr/share/elog/scripts# ll fckeditor
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 Oct 25 2014 fckeditor -> ../../fckeditor
root@static-3-080:/usr/share/elog/scripts# ll ../../fckeditor
ls: cannot access ../../fckeditor: No such file or directory
Is this a Deban misconfiguration or a bug in Elog? thanks
|
|
|
Attachment 1: elog-debian8.jpeg
|
|
68184
|
Mon Nov 9 12:15:16 2015 |
| Nicola | nicolamori@aol.com | Question | Linux | 2.9.2 | Re: WYSIWYG editor for Elog not working in Debian Jessie | Hi Andreas, understood. I found a 3.1.0 package for Debian unstable but it won't install on Jessie since it depends on a newer version of openssl, and it seems to not have a systemd unit (not sure about that, though). I can live with my old version now that the WYSIWYG editor works, and in the meantime I'll keep my eyes open for a brave soul who would eventually package a newer elog version for Jessie.
Thanks again for the support.
Andreas Luedeke wrote: |
Hi Nicola,
as Stefan pointed out: the debian package that you are using is from an outdated ELOG version and not supported anymore. I can't help you with that.
Is somebody out there that created a 3.1.x version debian package?
Cheers, Andreas
Nicola wrote: |
Hi Andreas, I opted for the first solution since the Debian package, although outdated and broken, has some goodies like a systemd unit for managing the daemon which is very handy. I downloaded FCKeditor 2.6.11 from SourceForge (after a long search, seems that CKeditor made its parent almost disappear from the web), unpacked it in the proper folder and not the WYSIWYG editor works. I have just a couple of minor issues: there is no attachment drop area (I had it in my old Debian 6 server) and the editor toolbar has an ugly "Windows 95" look; see the attached image. I can live with these problems but if the can be easily fixed then obviously I would do that, can you give me any hint? Thank you very much.
Andreas Luedeke wrote: |
Hi Nicola,
this appears to be a particular problem of the specific (outdated) ELOG debian package.
But you could just download the FCKeditor directly and install it to the proposed location "/usr/share/fckeditor".
Or you download ELOG 3.1.1 and give it a try to install it with the makefile.
Cheers, Andreas
Nicola wrote: |
I suspect that this might be a Debian packaging issue; however no one replied to my help request on the Debian forums so I try posting the question also here. I insatlled Elog on my Debian Jessie machine, I can open it with a browser but when entering a new post just a simple plain text editing box is shown instead of the WYSIWYG editor, and no drag and drop area for attachments is shown. When I start the elog service with "systemctl start elog" I get this suspect message in the journal: "FCKedit NOT detected". Indeed, I see that the elog installation creates a symlink which I guess is supposed to point to the fckeditor installation, which nevertheless is missing:
root@static-3-080:/usr/share/elog/scripts# ll fckeditor
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 Oct 25 2014 fckeditor -> ../../fckeditor
root@static-3-080:/usr/share/elog/scripts# ll ../../fckeditor
ls: cannot access ../../fckeditor: No such file or directory
Is this a Deban misconfiguration or a bug in Elog? thanks
|
|
|
|
|
69722
|
Mon Jan 22 08:22:33 2024 |
| Nicola | nicolamori@aol.com | Question | Linux | V3.1.3-7933898 | How to not expose elog port when running under a reverse proxy | I am running elog under Apache as explained in the administrator's guide. Everything works fine, butmy IT service complains about the elog port being publicly exposed, so I have to fix this. As far as I understand when running under a reverse proxy there's no need for the port to be publiuclyexposed, but I cannot find how to configure the elog server to expose it only locally |
69774
|
Mon Apr 8 15:46:49 2024 |
| Nick Sauerwein | nick.sauerwein@luxtelligence.ai | Info | Linux | 3.1.4 | Extendable list of numeric items | Hey eloggers,
I am setting up an ELOG to log the cleanroom fabrication in our startup (Luxtelligence SA). The fabrication is structured in different process steps that are performed by several wafers at the same time (each wafer as an ID).
I am looking for an possibility to put a list of several integers as one of the attributes.
Here an example:
Attributes = Batch ID, Wafer IDs
Type Batch ID = numeric
Type Wafer IDs = extendable list of numeric values
Does something like this exsist?
Thanks in advance for your help. |
69776
|
Mon Apr 8 17:23:00 2024 |
| Nick Sauerwein | Hi nick.sauerwein@luxtelligence.ai | Info | Linux | 3.1.4 | Re: Extendable list of numeric items | Hi John,
thanks for the info =). Do you known whether there is an example of how to use the list-boxes attributes?
Best,
Nick
John Kelly wrote: |
Hi Nick,
If I understand your question correctly maybe this might help:
Search for 'attribute' and you will find this:
"some attributes may be pre-filled from system variables (like your user name). Pre-filled attributes may be still editable or read-only (like the entry creation date.
Attributes may be text fields (limited to 100 characters), list-boxes (max. 100 values), or check-boxes. There is also a special type of attribute where several values are listed on a line with check-boxes, and you can check as many values as needed."
I guess this above is like creating an attribute field, that has attribute names. I *thought* there was a way to leave attributes open where users could create their own 'attribute' names, but the information above is all of what I remember from my past in depth work with Elog.
John
Nick Sauerwein wrote: |
Hey eloggers,
I am setting up an ELOG to log the cleanroom fabrication in our startup (Luxtelligence SA). The fabrication is structured in different process steps that are performed by several wafers at the same time (each wafer as an ID).
I am looking for an possibility to put a list of several integers as one of the attributes.
Here an example:
Attributes = Batch ID, Wafer IDs
Type Batch ID = numeric
Type Wafer IDs = extendable list of numeric values
Does something like this exsist?
Thanks in advance for your help.
|
|
|
69779
|
Tue Apr 9 09:25:01 2024 |
| Nick Sauerwein | nick.sauerwein@luxtelligence.ai | Info | Linux | 3.1.4 | Re: Extendable list of numeric items | Hey,
thanks for your answer. I completely get your point. However, I think my question as not precise enough.
I would like to have a numeric input, but many at the same time. When I make a new post, I would like to have an attribute 'wafer_IDs' that specifies the list of wafers this process has been performed with. So for a single post I would like to have a list like this:
wafer_IDs = numeric value, numeric value, numeric value, extendable
Note: I am not referring here to the option. The numeric values are freely chooses numbers, the only this that varies from post to post is the number of numeric values put.
Let me make an example (If the attribute were a string this would be the equivalent):
1st post: A process that was run with 3 wafers (ID: 1000, ID: 1001 and ID: 1002):
wafer IDs = 1000, 1001, 1002
2nd post: A process that is run with 2 wafers (ID: 1000 and ID: 1002):
wafer IDs = 1000, 1002
The string solves the issue, but is not as nice as having directly a list of integers.
Thanks for your help!
Best,
Nick |
|