Firstly, as with some of the others recently, I am a complete newb when it comes to linux, Though I refuse to let that stop me and really want to get this working.

Pretty much I have a situation where I have been asked to install ELOG, though I am unable to use port 25 at all and also need to use GMAIL for the SMTP server?
It is also my undertanding from the documentation that ELOG only sends mail via port 25

So, I have setup iptables to forward everything from port 25 and a GMAIL IP address used in ELOG's global config for the SMTP, to a stunnel that redirects everything to GMAIL on port 465.
While getting that right took me almost two days, and that was with tons of help and more than half of it being spoon fed to me (though I have learnt SO SO MUCH from just that).
I am still unable to get ELOG to send emails, even if does now seem to connect

Below is a copy of the log from last night (I have spent most of the day trying to sort it out further, but I get the same error)

So I guess my question is, Is it possible to use GMAIL, with ELOG, based on my current conditions, and does anyone have any idea what I can do to go on from here, as I doubt I am the first one to head down this road?
 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

10-Apr-2012 21:45:19 [Chris@1.2.3.4] {logbookA} Email from <chris@server.com> to chris@server.com, SMTP host 173.194.67.108:
10-Apr-2012 21:45:20 [Chris@1.2.3.4] {logbookA} 220 mx.google.com ESMTP XXXXXXXX.XX^M
10-Apr-2012 21:45:20 [Chris@1.2.3.4] {logbookA}
10-Apr-2012 21:45:20 [Chris@1.2.3.4] {logbookA} EHLO SERVER.COM^M
10-Apr-2012 21:45:20 [Chris@1.2.3.4] {logbookA} 250-mx.google.com at your service, [152.106.18.2]^M
10-Apr-2012 21:45:20 [Chris@1.2.3.4] {logbookA} 250-SIZE 35882577^M
10-Apr-2012 21:45:20 [Chris@1.2.3.4] {logbookA} 250-8BITMIME^M
10-Apr-2012 21:45:20 [Chris@1.2.3.4] {logbookA} 250-AUTH LOGIN PLAIN XOAUTH^M
10-Apr-2012 21:45:20 [Chris@1.2.3.4] {logbookA} 250 ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES^M
10-Apr-2012 21:45:20 [Chris@1.2.3.4] {logbookA} AUTH LOGIN^M
10-Apr-2012 21:45:21 [Chris@1.2.3.4] {logbookA} Username:
10-Apr-2012 21:45:21 [Chris@1.2.3.4] {logbookA} username@gmail.com
10-Apr-2012 21:45:21 [Chris@1.2.3.4] {logbookA} Password:
10-Apr-2012 21:45:21 [Chris@1.2.3.4] {logbookA} MYXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
10-Apr-2012 21:45:21 [Chris@1.2.3.4] {logbookA} 501 5.5.2 Cannot Decode response fl2sm792152wib.2

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Right now I am pretty stuck, and any advice would be greatly appreciated on how to move forward.

Thanks in Advance
 

As far as I know GMAIL requires SSL for its SMTP connection, which ELOG does not (yet) support. But you can set up your own SMTP server easily. Should be easier than your iptables work.  

It does require SSL, though thats where stunnel came in.(Thanks to Sergio for all the help and getting me that far, as well as with all the iptable help :D) .

I was however finally able to get it working just a few minutes ago using GMAIL as the SMTP.

I was able to telnet into smtp.gmail.com over the stunnel, and when I repeated the process that elog goes through from information that I grabbed with TCPdump, everthing would work, until it got to the password that ELOG sends and that was created using : /usr/local/sbin/elogd -t password -c /usr/local/elog/elogd.cfg. When I tried to decode the password, it also gave me errors.

I encoded the password myself, and when I changed the one in [global] to match the one I created instead, ELOG was able to connect and send mail (What I still dont understand is that when I encode my own username to use on telnet, it fails, but the one I got from the tcpdump from elog works.. so its a mixture of the ELOG encoded username, and my own encoded password).

I dont know if it would help if I type up the rest of what we did to get it working here for anyone else for future reference. It does require iptables and stunnel to be installed. Though its a single entry into iptables, and small addition to stunnel.conf once they are running.

I just upgraded to 3.1.0 after many years using 2.9.2. Our eLogs are absolutely crucial for the operation of our accelerators, so first of all I'd like to say: thanks a lot for everything you've done! It's a rock-solid application that works really well.

The issue I'm having is a minor one. Some of our users are using Internet Explorer 11, which has a Compatibility Mode option that is enabled by default for intranet sites (of which our eLog is one). This mode emulates IE7, and this causes the CKEditor rich text box to fail to load. I can tell our users to disable the CM setting on their browsers, but it may be that a simple server-side fix is possible as well.

It would be nice if the eLog pages could have a <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0"> tag, so that it displays nicely on smaller screens. I've been adding this myself in some Javascript code (see elogHelper.js on the above-linked website), but it doesn't appear on every page (the logbook selection page, for instance). I also made some modifications to the CSS so that the list display collapses down when the browser window is very narrow.

The new autosave functionality is really good. I hacked something together to do this for our log a while ago, but it's nice that it's inbuilt now.

Thanks again!

Ben

I don't get your point. If you add the meta tag wiht the viewport, then the IE7 mode will load the CKEditor? The CKEditor home page says that IE7 is not supported any more, so I wonder if this simple tag might help. Can you turn off the compatibility mode on a per-URL basis?

If I try on my smatphone, the display is correct, so why you need the viewport tag? Can you shouw me examples?

If you have nice CSS features which are helpful for everybody, please send them to me and I can include it in the distribution, but only after you convince me that it works (almost) everywhere.

Best,
Stefan

The viewport thing and the IE7 mode thing are separate issues.

OK, maybe it's a CKEditor thing then. I thought it might be. It seems pretty stupid that the default setting in IE is to emulate an older browser - although I guess a lot of people have very outdated intranet sites. Anyway, we have a fix here so I don't think you need to do anything. Just thought you might want to know.

The viewport tag issue - see attachments. The first two are the log selection page and the list page, both without the viewport tag. Obviously you can zoom in, but this is how they appear by default, as (apparently) Chrome tries to render the whole page width. The third one is how the list page appears when the viewport tag is added, and the fourth is with my custom CSS to put the columns on separate lines. It's probably very bad CSS, so I'm certain that it's not robust or cross-platform, but it works for me :)

/* make things look a bit nicer on smaller screens */
@media (max-width: 700px) {
	table.listframe td, table.listframe th {
		display: none;
	}

	/* show id, date, personnel, summary in separate lines */
	table.listframe td:nth-of-type(-n+2), table.listframe td:nth-of-type(4), table.listframe td:nth-last-of-type(2) {
		display: block;
		border: 0px;
	}
}

I have had to play around with viewports for other reasons than elog, but I do have a couple of comments to make.  Obviously the meta tag viewpoint has to be added in.  Also, elog was written for large screens (no-one thought anything else was possible when elog was started), and it is relatively recent that mobile devices have become a significant percentage of views of web pages.  Google is downgrading websites that are not mobile-friendly - that is, not starting with the viewport meta tag.  So there may have to be a fair re-arrangement of the default layout of elog for it to remain sensible on mobile devices. 

The attached css file (I made minor edits to someone else's - and they were freely giving it away), allows tabs running along the top of the page (below the title) for navigation.  So it would be nice if the elog tabs could operate in the same way when being used on a mobile device.  If select on one, it can become a drop down menu to select other tabs under that general top layer (I don't think that function is in the attached css file).  I've put a sample of such tabs (not drop down) in header.html attached.  Though I'm sure everyone else can write far better css and html code.

As I'm not a heavy mobile user, and often do need the whole screen to view matters, it would be nice if all of this could be optional in the elog.cfg file.

/* make things look a bit nicer on smaller screens */
@media (max-width: 700px) {
	table.listframe td, table.listframe th {
		display: none;
	}

	/* show id, date, personnel, summary in separate lines */
	table.listframe td:nth-of-type(-n+2), table.listframe td:nth-of-type(4), table.listframe td:nth-last-of-type(2) {
		display: block;
		border: 0px;
	}
}

Hi there,

our host running ELOG crashed. I installed ELOG at another host with copying backup files / folders to new installation. New installation looks fine and seems to be working. But one big problem occurs I only can see some of former existing logbooks. Are there any suggestions how to build an new ELOG with old data?

Many thanks Mario

Simply copy over your elogd.cfg file and all files under "logbooks". If you only see former logbooks, you grabbed probably the wrong elogd.cfg file.

Hi there,

our host running ELOG crashed. I installed ELOG at another host with copying backup files / folders to new installation. New installation looks fine and seems to be working. But one big problem occurs I only can see some of former existing logbooks. Are there any suggestions how to build an new ELOG with old data?

Many thanks Mario

Hej,

I discovered a problem uploading images taken with the cameras of mobile devices to new elog entries directly from said devices. When selecting the image and choosing "Upload", either the blue page loading indicator gets stuck at around 10% (mobile Safari, iOS 8.3, iPhone 4 and iPad mini) or the error message "failed secure connection; connection reset while page was being loaded" ("Fehler: gesicherte Verbindung fehlgeschlagen. Verbindung zum Server wurde zurueckgesetzt waehrend die Seite geladen wurde") appears shortly after (Android 5.02, Firefox 37.0.2, Motorola G).

From the desktop browser (Firefox 38.0.5, OSX 10.10) there is no problem uploading images at all.

So far, this problem is very reproducible, but only when using ELOG with SSL enabled. Without SSL, the problem disappears on all platforms.

The ELOG daemon runs under Linux (Fedora 18) and I have also tried using the latest development version of ELOG.

Running ELOG with debug messages the only output after the page has been loaded is:

TCP connection #0 on socket 4 closed
TCP connection #0 on socket 4 closed

After these, there is no further output and the mobile devices do not indicate any progress either even after many mi.

The minimal config file I have been using is:

[global]
; network
port = 443
SSL = 1
URL = https://my.server.somewhere/
; paths
Logbook dir = /usr/local/elog/logbooks
Resource dir = /usr/local/elog
Logfile = /tmp/elog.log

[demo]
Attributes = Author, Type, Category, Subject
Required Attributes = Author, Type
Options Type = Status, Modification, Problem Report, Problem Details, Problem Fixed, Other
Options Category = Facility, Experiment, IT, Other
List Page Title = $logbook - $subject

As mentioned before, removing the first three lines fixes the problem (the URL line points to my actual server of course).

I would appreciate any pointers on how to debug this further! The functionality of posting images directly from mobile devices is quite important for the planed deployment of ELOG and I would very much prefer to have SSL enabled when doing so.

Thanks and cheers,

Hanno

That's strange. Might have to do with the SSL library elog uses. I just tried this forum (actually the "Demo"), and it worked fine through SSL, but I use an Apache proxy server for elog implementing the SSL protocol, which might be slightly different.

On the subject of uploads, is there a way to restrict the viewing size of an uploaded photo or picture in the config? So it doesn't appear over more than one page.

Neal

Use thumbnails (need ImageMagick to be installed for that), and you can show for example 300x300 pixel thumbnails of all pictures.

Hej Stefan,

thanks for the suggestion -- through a Apache proxy the upload does indeed work without problems.

Cheers,

Hanno

Hello.

When I use "Revisions" name for attribute I have correct entry like "DATE by XXX from SOME_IP" which is added to previous edition date. 

But when i rename Revisions attribute to polish language (like "Wersje"), the entry is preceded by 3c6435es and whole looks like "3c6435es DATE by XXX from SOME_IP" and it overwrite previous entry. 

Is "Revisions" attribute must be in english?

Regards Daniel. 

Edit:

I know what I was doing wrong. I use:

Subst on Edit Wersje = $Revisions<br>$date przez $long_name z $remote_host

but it should be: 

Subst on Edit Wersje = $Wersje<br>$date przez $long_name z $remote_host

Hej,

I just noted that when having an unknown (or presumably misspelled) user name in the "Admin user" line in the
config file, that the other users are no longer treated as admins and do not see the corresponding link to the
admin page e.g. on the list page. In my specific situation, I in fact have only one user registered (new
password file) but two users still on the admin list (old config file). The one user is only treated as admin
after removing the offending name from the list of admins.

I understand that this might be the intended behavior -- but I wonder if this could lead to a situation where
one locks oneself out, e.g. when adding a misspelled user name to the list.


Thanks and cheers,

Hanno

Is there a way to limit access to an attribute "Reviewed by" to only supervisors?

Thank you for your help

Mike

No.