Is ELOG sending out cookies?, posted by David Pilgram on Wed Jun 10 14:25:16 2015
|
On my linux box, every time I select a thread, or start a new entry etc, I see that one or many cookies are sent.
On a terminal, I get the message
Received unknown cookie "CalciumDisplayParams" |
Re: Is ELOG sending out cookies?, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Jun 10 15:35:14 2015
|
Cookies are sent from your browser. ELOG has no influence on what the browser sends where. Probably you run your calender at the same machine where ELOG
is running, so all the cookies your calender app stores in your browser are sent to ELOG as well. ELOG just complains about something it does not know,
but otherwise this message can be simply ignored. Of course you can delete your cookies in your browser, but after the next call to your calendar app they |
|
Re: Is ELOG sending out cookies?, posted by David Pilgram on Wed Jun 10 15:48:57 2015
|
Hi Stefan,
Thanks for the explanation. I realised it was just an error message of no real import, but it can get irritating at times.
Stefan |
|
Formatting multiple datetime entries, posted by Edmund Hertle on Wed May 27 14:22:11 2015
|
Hey
in one of my measurement logbooks I'm using two datetime entries (for start and end time of a measurement). The entries are created automatically by the |
|
Re: Formatting multiple datetime entries, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Jun 10 11:52:47 2015
|
[quote="Edmund Hertle"]Hey
in one of my measurement logbooks I'm using two datetime entries (for start and end time of a measurement). The entries are created automatically by the |
|
Re: Formatting multiple datetime entries, posted by Neal Grafton on Wed Jun 10 12:48:41 2015
|
[quote="Stefan Ritt"][quote="Edmund Hertle"]Hey
in one of my measurement logbooks I'm using two datetime entries (for start and end time of a measurement). The entries are created automatically by the |
|
Re: Formatting multiple datetime entries, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Jun 10 12:52:48 2015
|
[quote="Neal Grafton"]
Also, is there a way of automatically displaying the difference in Hrs mins between Time start and Time End?[/quote]
|
|
Re: Formatting multiple datetime entries, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Jun 10 12:56:58 2015
|
[quote="Neal Grafton"]Also, is there a way of automatically displaying the difference in Hrs mins between Time start and Time End?[/quote]
I guess you want to do some more complex calculations, like adding the running times, etc. This goes beyond the scope of elog. You can however export elog |
|
Re: Formatting multiple datetime entries, posted by Neal Grafton on Wed Jun 10 13:00:07 2015
|
[quote="Stefan Ritt"][quote="Neal Grafton"]Also, is there a way of automatically displaying the difference in Hrs mins between Time start and Time End?[/quote]
I guess you want to do some more complex calculations, like adding the running times, etc. This goes beyond the scope of elog. You can however export elog |
elconv deletes everything, posted by Konstantin Olchanski on Wed May 20 01:49:37 2015
|
Converting from elog 2.9.something to new elog 3.1.0 elogd refuses to start, instructs running elconv in one logbook.
When I do so, elconv converts a existing mhttpd-style elog entries to the new format (the corresponding new-format entries already exist)
|
|
Re: elconv deletes everything, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Jun 10 11:39:23 2015
|
> - elogd should not tell us to run elconv when both old-style and corresponding new-style elog entries exist
I removed that check completely. The old format was used up to 2002, so I expect that all users have upgraded in meantime.
|
|
Timstamp button in ckedit inserts an incorrect string ( elogd 3.1.0-2), posted by David Wallis on Thu May 28 17:28:20 2015
|
I just updated to the latest official release (V3.1.0-2411f95)
and have this problem:
The Time Stamp button pastes the logbook name when "Time format" is not specified in elogd.cfg, and when it is set to "%m/%d/%Y |
|
ELOG Forum: drafts cannot be deleted, posted by Andreas Luedeke on Fri May 29 09:46:11 2015
|
I wanted to reply to the post "Three problems..." and then changed my mind.
But since this logbook does not allow to delete entries (not even my own) I was neither able to remove the draft
nor the final entry.
|
|
ELOG Forum: drafts cannot be deleted, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Jun 9 17:09:22 2015
|
> Another strange thing: the draft got submitted when I hit the "Back" button after reopening it.
Well, this is a problem indeed. When edit entries now, drafts gets saved regularly, overwriting your original entry. This is a limitation of the elog database, |
|
ELOG Forum: drafts cannot be deleted, posted by Andreas Luedeke on Wed Jun 10 10:43:02 2015
|
> > Another strange thing: the draft got submitted when I hit the "Back" button after reopening it.
>
> Well, this is a problem indeed. When edit entries now, drafts gets saved regularly, overwriting your original entry.
|
|
ELOG Forum: drafts cannot be deleted, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Jun 10 10:55:00 2015
|
> I think it would be nice to have three options:
> - "Submit": making the draft entry a "real" entry, with an ID
> - "Abort": keeping the entry as a draft entry as it currently is (or was 10 sec ago)
|
|
Re: Timstamp button in ckedit inserts an incorrect string ( elogd 3.1.0-2), posted by David Wallis on Thu Jun 4 18:12:43 2015
|
Additional info:
"Time format = %Y" results in "2015" being pasted into the edit window when I hit the "time stamp" button.
|
|
Re: ckeditor "Insert Timestamp" bug (was: Three problems with elogd 3.1.0-2), posted by Andreas Luedeke on Fri Jun 5 19:08:17 2015
|
I can confirm that there is currently a problem with the ckeditor "Insert Timestamp" button.
It apparently calls javascript
code in ckeditor/plugins/timestamp/plugin.js
to catch a string from the URL "../../?cmd=gettimedate"
(I think this
is one too many "../", but anyway). if you try this for the Forum:
https://midas.psi.ch/elogs/Forum/?cmd=gettimedate
it |
|
Re: ckeditor "Insert Timestamp" bug (was: Three problems with elogd 3.1.0-2), posted by David Wallis on Fri Jun 5 23:02:06 2015
|
Andreas,
I too was able to track the problem down to the "gettimedate" function in elogd.c. It looks like the code is using a variable named
"str" for several different purposes. I haven't had a chance to do any testing, but my suspsicion is that the size of the dynamically allocated |
|
Re: ckeditor "Insert Timestamp" bug (was: Three problems with elogd 3.1.0-2), posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon Jun 8 12:02:30 2015
|
Indeed the "str" variable at the gettimedate function had the wrong string size, so that all date strings got truncated at 8 characters. That's
what you've seen. Also the ../../?cmd=gettimedate was wrong and it
should be ./?cmd=gettimedate. I committed the fix to GIT so it will be |
|
subject line bug on resumit elog entries as new?, posted by Jacky Li on Fri May 29 22:32:20 2015
|
Hi,
I updated an old elog entry and resubmit it as new by checking the box resubmit as new. Does the subject line should said it is a "New
ELOG entry" instead of "Updated ELOG entry"? Thank you. |
|
Re: subject line bug on resumit elog entries as new?, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Jun 9 12:51:07 2015
|
I fixed both issues, now resubmitting an entry or submitting a new entry both yields "New LEOG entry".
Jacky
Li wrote:
Hi, |
|
Re: subject line bug on resumit elog entries as new?, posted by David Pilgram on Tue Jun 9 16:17:06 2015
|
Hi Stefan,
I see that you've updated the elog running this forum today, 5 versions after you reported fixing the "A new elog entry has been entered"
and "An old elog entry has been updated" issue. But the emails coming out are still all of the "An old elog entry...", rather |
|
Re: subject line bug on resumit elog entries as new?, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Jun 9 16:46:48 2015
|
Any better now?
David
Pilgram wrote:
Hi Stefan, |
|
Re: subject line bug on resumit elog entries as new?, posted by David Pilgram on Tue Jun 9 16:51:55 2015
|
Hi Stefan,
The email sent from here had he expected (correct) message "A new ELOG entry..."
Thanks, David. |
|
Re: subject line bug on resumit elog entries as new?, posted by Jacky Li on Tue Jun 9 22:31:59 2015
|
Hi,
I compiled the 3.1.0-2 source rpm from the download area. Unless there is a minor release, I think the problem is still there. Thank
you. |
Re: subject line bug on resumit elog entries as new?, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Jun 10 08:13:50 2015 
|
Making a new release takes me about an hour (compile under Windows, Linux, Mac OSX), so I don't do it for each little change. If you want to follow
the development closely, I recommend that you learn to compile elog from the GIT repository. It's pretty easy: a git
pull, followed by a make and |
Problem with a draft message, posted by David Pilgram on Tue Jun 9 17:17:11 2015
|
Hi Stefan,
I had started to write a completely different bug report, but then realised I had not checked a detail. I had written about one sentence.
So I decided to abort the message, and hit the "back" button. Only I found that this had created a new entry in the elog listings. |
|
Re: Problem with a draft message, posted by David Pilgram on Tue Jun 9 17:21:25 2015
|
Just to comment that I submitted the entry below by pressing the "Back" button!
David
Pilgram wrote:
Hi Stefan, |
|
Re: Problem with a draft message, posted by David Pilgram on Tue Jun 9 17:23:27 2015
|
Just to comment that the expected emails that one would have expected with the last two entries have either
been held up or simply have not been generated and sent - both the preceeding entries were submitted by using the "Back" button, this
time I'll use the "Submit" button, which should generate a email. |
|
Re: Problem with a draft message, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Jun 9 19:35:28 2015
|
Just read what I wrote at elog:67983
David
Pilgram wrote:
Just to comment that the expected emails that one would have expected |
|
Re: Problem with a draft message, posted by David Pilgram on Tue Jun 9 20:26:00 2015
|
I missed or don't remember that post. My vote is replace "Back" with "Delete" - or "Abort"
Stefan
Ritt wrote:
Just read what I wrote at elog:67983 |
logout to external page, posted by Christof Hanke on Wed May 6 11:00:14 2015
|
Hi Stefan,
I am happy to see that you include the webserver authentication.
So I can now login at some other page and then access elog. |
|
Re: logout to external page, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Jun 9 16:09:39 2015
|
I implemented it, but actually called it Logout to URL = <URL>
Christof
Hanke wrote:
Hi Stefan, |
|
Re: logout to external page, posted by Christof Hanke on Tue Jun 9 16:58:28 2015
|
Yes, I saw it on bitbucket, also all the commits. Thanks!
Stefan
Ritt wrote:
I implemented it, but actually called it |
|
Documentation of the webserver authentication, posted by Christof Hanke on Wed May 6 12:31:04 2015
|
Hi Stefan,
here is a draft of how you could describe the webserver authentication in your docs.
T/Christof |
|
Re: Documentation of the webserver authentication, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Jun 9 16:57:06 2015
|
Also this made it now to the docs. Thanks.
Christof
Hanke wrote:
Hi Stefan, |