ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
1983
|
Wed Oct 11 19:37:10 2006 |
| Gregory M. Caughey | caugheygm@aol.com | Bug report | Windows | 2.6.2-1722 | Re: Elog v2.6.2-1722 appears to have broken "Suppress default [0|1|2|3]" option on Windows XP box |
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Gregory M. Caughey wrote: | 2.) However, email notifications will be sent under all circumstances regardless of which parameter selected. |
Thanks for reporting that problem. I just implemented Suppress email on edit and this could have had some side effect. I tried however to reproduce your problem and was not able to. Trying the "minimal" configuration file, the email notifications were suppressed if the check box was checked, or if Suppress default = 3. Can you check if it works with a minimal config file, and if yes, what option in your "full" config file causes this effect? |
OK, you're absolutely correct. When I run Elog-2.6.2-1722 with a minimal 'elogd.cfg' the "Suppress default [0|1|2|3]" flag does appear to behave as expected. Taking your advice I went through my local 'elogd.cfg' evaluating items to see where the problem starts and I found a problem. In my local config file I use conditional attributes to modify the "category" and "type" fields (in the posting form) and here is what I'm finding wrong. For this example I have set "Suppress default = 3" and the following actions take place:
1.) Select "New" to begin a post and the form displays correctly with NO "[] Suppress Email notification" checkbox showing.
2.) When selecting "Category" an choosing an appropriate menu item the form is then redrawn and now there is a problem, the "[] Suppress Email notification" checkbox is displaying. The checkbox does work correctly but the behavior I'm expecting is for no checkbox to display during the composition of this posting. Am I misunderstanding the behavior of the "Suppress default = 3" flag?
3.) Each of the other flag parameters appear to work as expected as used in the above example.
I have attached screenshots that demonstrate this behavior as well as a snippet of the 'elogd.cfg' file.
Hope this helps a little...
Thanks, Greg |
Attachment 1: Capture10-11-2006-5.05.21_AM.jpg
|
|
Attachment 2: Capture10-11-2006-5.06.40_AM.jpg
|
|
Attachment 3: Capture10-11-2006-5.09.34_AM.jpg
|
|
2053
|
Wed Nov 8 13:59:52 2006 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Info | All | 2.6.2-6 | Denial of Service Vulnerability of elog 2.6.2-6 | Dear ELOG users,
a denial of service vulnerability has been reported which affects all elog versions prior to 2.6.2-7. With a special request one can crash the elogd server, given that one has access either through a public read access or through an account. This vulnerability has been fixed in version 2.6.2-7. It is advised that all sensitive installations of ELOG are being updated.
Stefan Ritt |
2098
|
Tue Nov 28 12:48:47 2006 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Info | All | 2.6.3 | Version 2.6.3 released today | Dear ELOG users,
ELOG version 2.6.3 has been released today. It contains all the bug fixes, security fixes and a few new features collected since the last release which was actually almost half a year ago. The changelog contains all the details.
Due to the security fixes it is recommended to upgrade from any version prior to 2.6.3. Please note that the location of all password and log files has been moved from the main elog directory to the logbook directory. This means that after upgrading you have to move your password file manually, otherwise you cannot log in any more. This modification was requested because some ELOG installations (especially ones with top groups) can now have a read-only main directory.
Stefan Ritt |
2145
|
Wed Feb 28 21:04:59 2007 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Info | All | 2.6.4-1801 | Simple table implemented in ELCode | Starting from SVN revision 1801, simple tables are supported in ELCode tags. One can now embed tables in elog entries like this:
[table border=3 cellpadding=10]
One | Two
|-
Three | Four
[/table]
which produces following table:
The syntax is explained in the ELCode help page. |
2147
|
Thu Mar 1 15:46:59 2007 |
| Robert-Jan Schrijvers | Robert-Jan.Schrijvers@isoft.nl | Question | Windows | V2.6.3-176 | Finding conditions in Search page. | Hi all,
My config file (a part of it) looks like this:
Options Locatie = Intern{a}, Extern{b}, Demo/Ontwikkel{c}, Hardware{d}, ---------------------, Anders
{a}Options Sessies = p-zis-pr1{1}, p-szh-pro{2}, p-dia-pro{3}, a-zis-ac1{1}, a-zis-ac2{2}, a-dia-acc{3}, ---------------------, Anders
{b} Options Sessies = FSC Pro{4}, FSC Acc{4}, Risc/Bus/Sms Pro{5}, Risc/Bus/Sms Acc{5}, ---------------------, Anders
{c} Options Sessies = BAO, BEH, BAOMPSO, BEHMPSO, Demonstrator, AFS, PTG, BSN, ---------------------, Anders
{d} Options Sessies = Wijziging, Storing
{1} Options Orgus = AZS, IZR, HPZ, iSOFT
{2} Options Orgus = VZL, Trombo, iSOFT
{3} Options Orgus = Diac, iSOFT
{4} Options Orgus = AMG, ZHH/Tergooi, ZNB
{5} Options Orgus = GOZL, MCA, MZG, SEH, SJD, ZGN
This is my question: when i use the "search/find" page and select the first drop down menu "Locatie", the next field "Sessies" will not be displayed (and all following fields either). On the other hand, when i create a new entry, it works perfect, select "Locatie", field "Sessies" displays his content and so on. I hope that someone can help me with this. |
2183
|
Tue Apr 3 13:17:27 2007 |
| Yoshio Imai | | Request | Linux | 2.6.4-1795 | Multiple ideas for multiple logbooks | Hi!
After a long pause, here we are again with a bunch of new ideas (and problems ...;) )
1. Multiple login
Since we are using the elog system now for most aspects of our work, we are more and more often confronted with the need to work with different logbooks open in parallel (e.g. the shift logbook as well as the personal analysis logbook, via tabbed browsing). These logbooks do not always have the same users allowed to access them, so when having logged on to one logbook and then opening another one in a different browser tab, I have to log on as a different user, thereby losing the login on the first logbook. Is there any way to change the cookie structure so as to allow one (physical) user to be logged on as more than one elog user at a time?
2. <Ctrl-T>
While using this logbook (and tabbed browsing), I noticed that the keyboard shortcut <Ctrl-T> now leads to the creation of a table (great thing, btw). However, many of our users are accustomed to this shortcut opening a new browser Tab. Is there any way to disable these elog shortcuts or otherwise disentangle these functions (by using <Alt> instead of <Ctrl> or something similar, since the functionality itself is very good)?
Thanks for any idea on these issues, and thanks for the great software! |
2224
|
Fri Apr 27 14:06:34 2007 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Info | All | SVN 1857+ | How to make a table of contents | For those people who have not fully understood the discussion of elog:2218, here is an example table of contents.
First Chapter
The table of contents consists of a set of [url] tags like this:
[url=#first]First chapter[/url]
[url=#second]Second chapter[/url]
[url=#thirs]Third chapter[/url]
Then the chapter header contains a tag like this:
[ANCHOR]first[/ANCHOR]
to which the browser ups if you click the corresponding entry in the table of contents.
... empty lines to full up some space ...
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Second chapter
You should jump here if you click on Second chapter at the table of contents.
Third chapter
You should jump here if you click on Third chapter at the table of contents. |
2302
|
Fri Aug 3 15:49:05 2007 |
| Grant Jeffcote | grant@jeffcote.org | Question | Windows | 2.6.5-1903 | Boolean | Stefan,
I've noticed in the latest release when using the 'Find' page that any boolean expression (tick box) is now shown as '0,1 or unspecified'. Is this intentional? My colleagues are finding it hard to get their heads around what to choose and preferred the old 'Tick Box' option. Have there been changes to the configuration arguments used for Boolean that I've missed?
Thanks |
|