> I develop multiple client server apps and web apps deployed on intranets. I
> need my users to send me bugs with screenshots attached.

Nice idea. I was looking myself for a way to automatically attach screenshots,
but I haven't found a clever way yet. One problem with attachments I found is
that it is not possible to preset the attachment text box with a file name
because this would open up a big security hole. So a malicious web page would
preset the attachment box with a file name pointing to some local password file,
then hide the box somwhere by using a tiny font etc. So if someone presses
"submit", the secret file would automatically transferred to the remote site.
Now I don't know if this can be bypassed with JavaScript.
 
> Now apparently that wasn't fully working or at least you couldn't bring up
> multiple alerts. Has that been fixed, or is it just a problem with alerts?

The JavaScript you supply simply gets copied to the web page and executed. There
are no limitations of any kind from the elog system there. So if you have
problems, it's most likely a JavaScript problem. I found it very useful to use
the Venkman debugger (http://www.mozilla.org/projects/venkman/) which can run
inside Mozilla based browsers.

> Can I write a url that has my attributes, plus a short js script that just
> adds an attachment?

It should be in principle possible, limited maybe only with the security note I
wrote above. If you get anything working, I would appreciate if you could add
this to the "contributions" section, so that other people can benefit from this.

tuens out that the first log file was causing the problem. Elconv would just hang 
on trying to convert it. renamed it, reran elconv, reload service and 2.51 elogd 
and all was working as it should.


> Have a working copy of 1.35 running on NT4 server.
> Went to upgrade to latest version.
> Stopped service, installed the 2.52 version, restarted service and when 
> trying to connect get nothing but server not found, dns errors, etc.
> Copy back the 1.35 elogd.exe and everything is fine - I can connect and add 
> entries to log.
> Copy 2.52 elogd.exe and nothing.
> 
> So being the bright boy, I unistalled E-log, went through the registry and 
> yanked everything out that referenced ELOGD, rebooted, installed 2.52, made 
> the necessary registry changes, started service and nothing. 
> 
> Stopped service and copied 1.35 Elogd.exe back into folder, started service, 
> and everything works.
> 
> Any ideas on why 1.35 works like a charm but 2.52 won't? I've tried stepping 
> back to 2.10 version before giving up.
> 
> This is a server that is patched to latest and runs quite well with 1.35.

Have a working copy of 1.35 running on NT4 server.
Went to upgrade to latest version.
Stopped service, installed the 2.52 version, restarted service and when 
trying to connect get nothing but server not found, dns errors, etc.
Copy back the 1.35 elogd.exe and everything is fine - I can connect and add 
entries to log.
Copy 2.52 elogd.exe and nothing.

So being the bright boy, I unistalled E-log, went through the registry and 
yanked everything out that referenced ELOGD, rebooted, installed 2.52, made 
the necessary registry changes, started service and nothing. 

Stopped service and copied 1.35 Elogd.exe back into folder, started service, 
and everything works.

Any ideas on why 1.35 works like a charm but 2.52 won't? I've tried stepping 
back to 2.10 version before giving up.

This is a server that is patched to latest and runs quite well with 1.35.

we've experienced a problem when using the safari browser to do a search in
our elog. whenever you do a search, the logbook returns an error and the
elog deamon crashes. when we first experienced this problem we were running
version 2.3.9. however, an upgrade to version 2.5.2 doesn't seem to fix the
problem. searches with other browsers (mozilla, internet explorer, ...) go
off without a hitch.
has anyone else observed a similar problem or have any ideas on how to
resolve this issue.
thanks for the help.

elog running on a redhat 9 box
safari running on panther

I searched and found some problems people were having compiling it on Solaris.
However I didn't see anything else.

If your using it, was it hard to get it installed and working?

I develop multiple client server apps and web apps deployed on intranets. I
need my users to send me bugs with screenshots attached.

So I'm interested in auto opening a new elog page in an embedded browser and
automatically doing an attachment. I've seen a couple messages about
recently added Javascript hooks (message 465). The message specified a URL
that would fire off javascript(http://localhost/demo/?cmd=New&js=test.js).
Now apparently that wasn't fully working or at least you couldn't bring up
multiple alerts. Has that been fixed, or is it just a problem with alerts?
Can I write a url that has my attributes, plus a short js script that just
adds an attachment?

Anyhow, any info on where this functionality is would be appreciated. I'm
going back to my mgmt for signoff on using this, and if I get it (fairly
high probability), then I'll have a coder start implementing it. :-)

BTW, great tool! Very clean design.

Cheers,
Robin

> I was able to find the export feature under find. Could you let me know where 
> the import feature is? Or how I turn it on.

Oops, I frogot to document this, thank you for reminding me. You have to add the
"CSV Import" command manually to the list of menu commands, like:

Find menu commands = New, Find, Select, Config, CSV Import, Help

I was wondering if I should make this as the default, but many people maybe do not
have the demand of having CSV Import, so it might be annoying for them. What do
you think?

> Version 2.5.2 of ELOG has been released today. It contains CSV (comma
> separated values) import and export, as well as XML export (through the
> "Find" page). Since these features are new, I would appreciate some feedback
> on how this works in different environments. I made sure I can import data
> from Excel and Outlook (like my address book), but I have no experience with
> other applications.
> 
> As with the XML export, I'm not sure if the format I chose is a good one.
> People working more with XML should tell me if it should be changed.

I was able to find the export feature under find. Could you let me know where 
the import feature is? Or how I turn it on.

-Charles-