Record Proliferation, posted by Paraic Fahey on Mon Mar 5 16:19:24 2012
|
Saving, using Submit sees recently updated fields cleared after hitting SUBMIT.
MOre significantly this then leads to a proliferation of instances of the same record being generated in the logfile and consequently on the logbook.
Has anybody a fix or advice on this? |
Re: Record Proliferation, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Mar 14 14:45:23 2012
|
Paraic Fahey wrote:
Saving, using Submit sees recently updated fields cleared after hitting SUBMIT. |
Re: Record Proliferation, posted by David Pilgram on Wed Mar 14 15:34:41 2012
|
Stefan Ritt wrote:
|
New user: problem with configuration (password file), posted by Nicolas FRANCOIS on Thu Feb 23 16:23:10 2012
|
Hi.
I'd like to use elog as a tool ta keep my notes, links, passwords... It's installed on my personal computer at home (Debian Squeeze), behind a |
Number of Thumnails , posted by Diego on Wed Feb 22 14:19:19 2012
|
Hi,
I have Ghostscript 9.05 and ImageMagic 6.7.5 Q16 installed with the last ELOG version in a windows 7 OS. When I try to attach a pdf file and then
create thumnails of the file, I am only able to create the first 8 pages instead all document. I have try to change the parameter Thumbnail size but |
redirect permission, posted by Adam on Mon Feb 13 13:38:19 2012
|
Hi All,
Perhaps a trivial question but some issues have arisen accessing my long-running elog with SSL enabled. I suspect firewalls and browser updates
are involved and I do not have the time or experience to diagnose and debug such a potential black-hole of difficulties. Instead I am looking for |
Re: redirect permission, posted by Adam on Wed Feb 22 13:18:37 2012
|
Adam wrote:
Hi All, |
ssl problems, posted by Olaf Kasten on Fri Feb 10 11:54:35 2012
|
Hi there,
I have a connection problem with an actual elog installation. Many Browsers like as Chrome, Firefox and IE don't connect to the elog
server with ssl = 1 in elogd.cfg. |
Re: ssl problems, posted by John Doroshenko on Fri Feb 10 17:18:25 2012
|
Olaf Kasten wrote:
Hi there, |
Re: ssl problems, posted by Andreas Luedeke on Sat Feb 11 05:43:33 2012
|
John Doroshenko wrote:
|
Re: ssl problems, posted by Christian Herzog on Sat Feb 11 22:05:36 2012
|
Andreas Luedeke wrote:
|
Re: ssl problems, posted by Andreas Luedeke on Sat Feb 11 22:19:07 2012
|
Christian Herzog wrote:
|
Re: ssl problems, posted by Christian Herzog on Sat Feb 11 22:27:15 2012
|
well it's not a server but my laptop, but yeah, the elog server and the browser ran on the same machine, no iptables. |
Re: ssl problems, posted by Andreas Luedeke on Sat Feb 11 22:37:34 2012
|
> well it's not a server but my laptop, but yeah, the elog server and the browser ran on the same machine, no iptables.
Strange: I thought I was able to reproduce your problem, but no: whatever browser I try I can access ELOG with SSL if
|
Re: ssl problems, posted by Olaf Kasten on Mon Feb 13 21:44:05 2012
|
> > well it's not a server but my laptop, but yeah, the elog server and the browser ran on the same machine, no iptables.
>
> Strange: I thought I was able to reproduce your problem, but no: whatever browser I try I can access ELOG with SSL if
|
Re: ssl problems, posted by John Doroshenko on Tue Feb 14 00:55:58 2012
|
Andreas Luedeke wrote:
|
Re: ssl problems, posted by Andreas Luedeke on Tue Feb 14 14:54:06 2012
|
John Doroshenko wrote:
|
Re: ssl problems, posted by Diego on Tue Feb 14 17:17:44 2012
|
Andreas Luedeke wrote:
|
Re: ssl problems, posted by John Doroshenko on Tue Feb 14 20:41:08 2012
|
John Doroshenko wrote:
|
Re: ssl problems, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Feb 16 18:10:33 2012
|
Yes, there is a new feature called record splitting which causes the browser to send the "G" of the "GET ..." in a dedicated TCP
package. This started in FF10, Chrome 17, and it will come in others as well. It only affects direct SSL connections (SSL=1). I fixed the bug in SVN revision
#2435. Please update also MXML to revision #73. Let's hope that surprises like that will not happen too often. |
Re: ssl problems, posted by John Doroshenko on Thu Feb 16 23:56:35 2012
|
Stefan Ritt wrote:
Yes, there is a new feature called record splitting which causes the browser to send the "G" |
Re: ssl problems, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon Feb 20 14:53:04 2012
|
Stefan Ritt wrote:
Yes, there is a new feature called record splitting which causes the browser to send the "G" |
elog entry in email footer?, posted by Mark Bergman on Wed Feb 15 17:17:27 2012
|
On our system, elog sends email to all people associated with an entry. Often, people will respond via email, not through elog. I'm in the process of
setting up a handler for the inbound email. However, I'd like to have the outbound mail from eLog include a 'footer' to each message the details where
to go to respond. |
top text in new user, posted by Diego on Mon Feb 13 22:13:40 2012
|
Hi,
I am using Top text becouse I would like to have the same header in all logbooks. However it is working in the "new user registration page"
and I would like to evoid it. Is that possible? |
problems with https in Chrome and IE, posted by Christian Herzog on Wed Jan 25 10:07:16 2012
|
Hi,
we're evaluating elog right now at the Physics Department of ETH Zurich and I'm trying to come up with a good config. One of the first steps of |
Re: problems with https in Chrome and IE, posted by Andreas Luedeke on Wed Jan 25 10:50:43 2012
|
Christian Herzog wrote:
[...] we're evaluating elog right now at the Physics Department of ETH Zurich and I'm trying to |
Re: problems with https in Chrome and IE, posted by Christian Herzog on Wed Jan 25 14:05:46 2012
|
Andreas Luedeke wrote:
|
Re: problems with https in Chrome and IE, posted by Andreas Luedeke on Wed Jan 25 14:48:36 2012
|
Christian Herzog wrote:
|
Re: problems with https in Chrome and IE, posted by Christian Herzog on Wed Jan 25 15:08:53 2012
|
Andreas Luedeke wrote:
|
Re: problems with https in Chrome and IE, posted by Andreas Luedeke on Wed Jan 25 15:26:04 2012
|
Christian Herzog wrote:
|
Re: problems with https in Chrome and IE, posted by Christian Herzog on Wed Jan 25 15:33:59 2012
|
Andreas Luedeke wrote:
|
Re: problems with https in Chrome and IE, posted by Yoshio Imai on Wed Jan 25 15:40:17 2012
|
Might this be related to the problem reported by [url=elog:67160]Allen[/url]? |
Re: problems with https in Chrome and IE, posted by Christian Herzog on Wed Jan 25 15:42:17 2012
|
[quote="Yoshio Imai"]Might this be related to the problem reported by [url=elog:67160]Allen[/url]?[/quote]
can't tell, but Chrome on Linux doesn't work either... |
Re: problems with https in Chrome and IE, posted by Andreas Luedeke on Wed Jan 25 16:05:13 2012
|
Christian Herzog wrote:
|
Re: problems with https in Chrome and IE, posted by Christian Herzog on Wed Jan 25 16:13:22 2012
|
Andreas Luedeke wrote:
|
Re: problems with https in Chrome and IE, posted by Christian Herzog on Wed Jan 25 19:47:38 2012
|
Christian Herzog wrote:
|
Re: problems with https in Chrome and IE, posted by Andreas Luedeke on Sat Feb 11 05:47:27 2012
|
Christian Herzog wrote:
|
Re: problems with https in Chrome and IE, posted by Christian Herzog on Sat Feb 11 22:07:37 2012
|
Andreas Luedeke wrote:
|
Re: problems with https in Chrome and IE, posted by Diego on Mon Feb 13 18:36:29 2012
|
Christian Herzog wrote:
|