Elog on Windows Server 2008 R2, 64 bit, posted by Alan Grant on Fri Mar 16 23:59:10 2012
|
Any known issues running in Win Server 2008 R2, 64 bit environment? We sometimes lose connection with the Elog app (ssl) and wonder if due to 64bit
or other factor in this set up. A forum search does not explicitly reveal any clues however I did find an entry from someone posting a similar question
without a response yet (#67061). |
Truncation of the displayed text in Summary view of the list of entries, posted by Olivier Callot on Thu Mar 8 10:01:47 2012
|
In the summary view, it seems that the text is truncated at the first "<" character. See https://lblogbook.cern.ch/Shift/48812 for
a simple entry, then use the 'list' command to see that only a very small part is displayed. |
Re: Truncation of the displayed text in Summary view of the list of entries, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Mar 14 14:38:10 2012
|
Olivier Callot wrote:
In the summary view, it seems that the text is truncated at the first "<" character. See |
Re: Truncation of the displayed text in Summary view of the list of entries, posted by Olivier Callot on Wed Mar 14 15:08:17 2012
|
Stefan Ritt wrote:
|
|
Re: Truncation of the displayed text in Summary view of the list of entries, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Mar 14 16:04:04 2012
|
Olivier Callot wrote:
|
|
Record Proliferation, posted by Paraic Fahey on Mon Mar 5 16:19:24 2012
|
Saving, using Submit sees recently updated fields cleared after hitting SUBMIT.
MOre significantly this then leads to a proliferation of instances of the same record being generated in the logfile and consequently on the logbook.
Has anybody a fix or advice on this? |
|
Re: Record Proliferation, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Mar 14 14:45:23 2012
|
Paraic Fahey wrote:
Saving, using Submit sees recently updated fields cleared after hitting SUBMIT. |
|
Re: Record Proliferation, posted by David Pilgram on Wed Mar 14 15:34:41 2012
|
Stefan Ritt wrote:
|
|
New user: problem with configuration (password file), posted by Nicolas FRANCOIS on Thu Feb 23 16:23:10 2012
|
Hi.
I'd like to use elog as a tool ta keep my notes, links, passwords... It's installed on my personal computer at home (Debian Squeeze), behind a |
|
Number of Thumnails , posted by Diego on Wed Feb 22 14:19:19 2012
|
Hi,
I have Ghostscript 9.05 and ImageMagic 6.7.5 Q16 installed with the last ELOG version in a windows 7 OS. When I try to attach a pdf file and then
create thumnails of the file, I am only able to create the first 8 pages instead all document. I have try to change the parameter Thumbnail size but |
|
redirect permission, posted by Adam on Mon Feb 13 13:38:19 2012
|
Hi All,
Perhaps a trivial question but some issues have arisen accessing my long-running elog with SSL enabled. I suspect firewalls and browser updates
are involved and I do not have the time or experience to diagnose and debug such a potential black-hole of difficulties. Instead I am looking for |
|
Re: redirect permission, posted by Adam on Wed Feb 22 13:18:37 2012
|
Adam wrote:
Hi All, |
|
ssl problems, posted by Olaf Kasten on Fri Feb 10 11:54:35 2012
|
Hi there,
I have a connection problem with an actual elog installation. Many Browsers like as Chrome, Firefox and IE don't connect to the elog
server with ssl = 1 in elogd.cfg. |
|
Re: ssl problems, posted by John Doroshenko on Fri Feb 10 17:18:25 2012
|
Olaf Kasten wrote:
Hi there, |
|
Re: ssl problems, posted by Andreas Luedeke on Sat Feb 11 05:43:33 2012
|
John Doroshenko wrote:
|
|
Re: ssl problems, posted by Christian Herzog on Sat Feb 11 22:05:36 2012
|
Andreas Luedeke wrote:
|
|
Re: ssl problems, posted by Andreas Luedeke on Sat Feb 11 22:19:07 2012
|
Christian Herzog wrote:
|
|
Re: ssl problems, posted by Christian Herzog on Sat Feb 11 22:27:15 2012
|
| well it's not a server but my laptop, but yeah, the elog server and the browser ran on the same machine, no iptables. |
|
Re: ssl problems, posted by Andreas Luedeke on Sat Feb 11 22:37:34 2012
|
> well it's not a server but my laptop, but yeah, the elog server and the browser ran on the same machine, no iptables.
Strange: I thought I was able to reproduce your problem, but no: whatever browser I try I can access ELOG with SSL if
|
|
Re: ssl problems, posted by Olaf Kasten on Mon Feb 13 21:44:05 2012
|
> > well it's not a server but my laptop, but yeah, the elog server and the browser ran on the same machine, no iptables.
>
> Strange: I thought I was able to reproduce your problem, but no: whatever browser I try I can access ELOG with SSL if
|
|
Re: ssl problems, posted by John Doroshenko on Tue Feb 14 00:55:58 2012
|
Andreas Luedeke wrote:
|
|
Re: ssl problems, posted by Andreas Luedeke on Tue Feb 14 14:54:06 2012
|
John Doroshenko wrote:
|
|
Re: ssl problems, posted by Diego on Tue Feb 14 17:17:44 2012
|
Andreas Luedeke wrote:
|
Re: ssl problems, posted by John Doroshenko on Tue Feb 14 20:41:08 2012 
|
John Doroshenko wrote:
|
|
Re: ssl problems, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Feb 16 18:10:33 2012
|
Yes, there is a new feature called record splitting which causes the browser to send the "G" of the "GET ..." in a dedicated TCP
package. This started in FF10, Chrome 17, and it will come in others as well. It only affects direct SSL connections (SSL=1). I fixed the bug in SVN revision
#2435. Please update also MXML to revision #73. Let's hope that surprises like that will not happen too often. |
|
Re: ssl problems, posted by John Doroshenko on Thu Feb 16 23:56:35 2012
|
Stefan Ritt wrote:
Yes, there is a new feature called record splitting which causes the browser to send the "G" |
|
Re: ssl problems, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon Feb 20 14:53:04 2012
|
Stefan Ritt wrote:
Yes, there is a new feature called record splitting which causes the browser to send the "G" |
|
elog entry in email footer?, posted by Mark Bergman on Wed Feb 15 17:17:27 2012
|
On our system, elog sends email to all people associated with an entry. Often, people will respond via email, not through elog. I'm in the process of
setting up a handler for the inbound email. However, I'd like to have the outbound mail from eLog include a 'footer' to each message the details where
to go to respond. |