Option to require new user registration to subscribe to ALL logbooks, posted by Steve Jones on Mon Nov 6 19:03:11 2006
|
Stefan, any chance of having an option that eliminates the ability of new users to pick the logbooks they can register with? I would like to limit this
to the "admin" user to pick per individual.
|
Re: Option to require new user registration to subscribe to ALL logbooks, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Nov 9 22:57:38 2006
|
[quote="Steve Jones"]Stefan, any chance of having an option that eliminates the ability of new users to pick the logbooks they can register with? I would
like to limit this to the "admin" user to pick per individual.[/quote]
|
|
Re: Option to require new user registration to subscribe to ALL logbooks, posted by Steve Jones on Thu Nov 9 23:37:37 2006
|
[quote="Stefan Ritt"][quote="Steve Jones"]Stefan, any chance of having an option that eliminates the ability of new users to pick the logbooks they can
register with? I would like to limit this to the "admin" user to pick per individual.[/quote]
|
How can I configure to prevent empty entries?, posted by Alan Stone on Mon Apr 10 20:28:37 2006
|
I have accidentally created a couple of entries recently. It is pretty easy. I
fill in the header, type in a Subject, and then hit Enter, instead of TAB.
I have turned off the edit option intentionally.
|
|
Re: How can I configure to prevent empty entries?, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Nov 9 23:10:08 2006
|
[quote="Alan Stone"]I have accidentally created a couple of entries recently. It is pretty easy. I
fill in the header, type in a Subject, and then hit Enter, instead of TAB.
I have turned off the edit option intentionally.
|
|
Is it possible to require certain attributes for specific users (guests)?, posted by Mark Bergman on Tue May 2 22:58:48 2006
|
First of all, thanks for writing and maintaining eLog.
I've been using it for a few years, but I'm now introducing it in an environment that may have a lot of "Guest"
|
|
Re: Is it possible to require certain attributes for specific users (guests)?, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed May 3 08:31:52 2006
|
> First of all, thanks for writing and maintaining eLog.
>
> I've been using it for a few years, but I'm now introducing it in an environment that may have a lot of "Guest"
|
|
Re: Is it possible to require certain attributes for specific users (guests)?, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Nov 9 23:04:32 2006
|
> First of all, thanks for writing and maintaining eLog.
>
> I've been using it for a few years, but I'm now introducing it in an environment that may have a lot of "Guest"
|
suggestion for "new user registration" page, posted by Mark Bergman on Sat May 6 02:12:10 2006
|
I'm testing elog, and one user was having difficulty creating a new account for himself. This problem had three reasons:
1. the user expected a "submit" button or some other way to exit the account registration screen to appear near the password boxes, at the bottom of the |
|
Re: suggestion for "new user registration" page, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Nov 9 22:40:06 2006
|
[quote="Mark Bergman"]Suggestions for improving the registration page:
Put a "submit" button after the password entry.
|
|
Problem with large entry size, posted by Dimitrios Tsirigkas on Mon Oct 16 16:20:06 2006
|
Hi Stefan,
I have posted an entry of approximately a thousand lines (ten thousand words). Posting it took some time, which is logical to a certain degree. However, |
|
Re: Problem with large entry size, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon Oct 16 16:53:43 2006
|
[quote="Dimitrios Tsirigkas"]I have posted an entry of approximately a thousand lines (ten thousand words). Posting it took some time, which is logical
to a certain degree. However, whenever a user asks for "Full" view of the logbook, the page takes around two minutes to load and the CPU usage on the elog
server goes to beyond 90% for all this time. Is this to be expected for an entry of that size or is there something going wrong here?[/quote]
|
|
Re: Problem with large entry size, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon Oct 16 17:18:58 2006
|
I improved the performance by some factor in SVN revision 1733. Can you give it a try and report your speed improvement? Depending on the result, I can
probably do even a bit better with some more effort.
|
|
Re: Problem with large entry size, posted by Dimitrios Tsirigkas on Mon Oct 16 17:32:58 2006
|
[quote="Stefan Ritt"]I improved the performance by some factor in SVN revision 1733. Can you give it a try and report your speed improvement? Depending
on the result, I can probably do even a bit better with some more effort.
|
|
Re: Problem with large entry size, posted by Dimitrios Tsirigkas on Tue Oct 17 14:39:29 2006
|
[quote="Stefan Ritt"]
The problem lies in the ELCode parsing. When you post an entry in ELCode form, the elogd server has to parse every word to see if it's any of the ELcode
tags. This is right now implemented in a kind of poor way, such that it takes very long for long entries. I will work to optimize that. In the meantime, |
|
Re: Problem with large entry size, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Oct 17 14:42:58 2006
|
[quote="Dimitrios Tsirigkas"]I was wondering what is the cleanest way of changing old entries already submitted in ELCode into plain text. If I do not include
ELCode in the allowed encodings does this apply to already submitted entries as well or will they still be treated as ELCode?[/quote]
|
|
Re: Problem with large entry size, posted by Dimitrios Tsirigkas on Tue Oct 17 14:47:53 2006
|
Thanks Stefan,
[quote="Stefan Ritt"] Did you try the new version, would be interesting to see if it's any better... [/quote]
|
|
Re: Problem with large entry size, posted by Dimitrios Tsirigkas on Mon Oct 23 12:53:08 2006
|
Hi Stefan,
A lot of performance-related trouble for us comes from the ability of users to click on "All" and display thousands of entries on the same page. Is there |
|
Re: Problem with large entry size, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Oct 24 21:58:54 2006
|
[quote="Dimitrios Tsirigkas"]Hi Stefan,
A lot of performance-related trouble for us comes from the ability of users to click on "All" and display thousands of entries on the same page. Is there |
|
Re: Problem with large entry size, posted by Dimitrios Tsirigkas on Thu Nov 2 10:14:11 2006
|
[quote="Stefan Ritt"]What about a threshold for the "All" display? If a logbook contains less than, let's say, 500 entries, the "All" link is displayed,
and above 500 entries it's hidden. Would that make sense?[/quote]
|
|
Re: Problem with large entry size, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Nov 9 21:22:27 2006
|
[quote="Dimitrios Tsirigkas"][quote="Stefan Ritt"]What about a threshold for the "All" display? If a logbook contains less than, let's say, 500 entries,
the "All" link is displayed, and above 500 entries it's hidden. Would that make sense?[/quote]
|
|
ELCode, posted by Alexandre Lindote on Wed Oct 25 18:00:24 2006
|
Hi,
can you think of any obvious reason why the ELCode would not work in the logbooks I set up?
|
|
Re: ELCode, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Oct 25 19:44:11 2006
|
[quote="Alexandre Lindote"]can you think of any obvious reason why the ELCode would not work in the logbooks I set up?[/quote]
There is a good reason why this forum contains a [B]ELOG Version[/B] tag which you are supposed to fill out for new entries. Without knowing which version |
|
Re: ELCode, posted by Alexandre Lindote on Wed Oct 25 21:52:13 2006
|
[quote="Stefan Ritt"][quote="Alexandre Lindote"]can you think of any obvious reason why the ELCode would not work in the logbooks I set up?[/quote]
There is a good reason why this forum contains a [B]ELOG Version[/B] tag which you are supposed to fill out for new entries. Without knowing which version |
|
Re: ELCode, posted by Alexandre Lindote on Fri Oct 27 13:02:50 2006
|
[quote="Alexandre Lindote"]Hi,
can you think of any obvious reason why the ELCode would not work in the logbooks I set up?
|
|
Re: ELCode, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Nov 9 21:03:03 2006
|
[quote="Alexandre Lindote"][quote="Alexandre Lindote"]Hi,
can you think of any obvious reason why the ELCode would not work in the logbooks I set up?
|
|
calling a shell in the Options tag, posted by Alexandre Lindote on Tue Oct 31 20:05:07 2006
|
Hi,
is it possible to run a shell script in an "Options" tag, as it is with the "Preset", "Subst", and so on?
|
|
Re: calling a shell in the Options tag, posted by Steve Jones on Tue Oct 31 22:07:06 2006
|
[quote="Alexandre Lindote"]Hi,
is it possible to run a shell script in an "Options" tag, as it is with the "Preset", "Subst", and so on?
|
|
Re: calling a shell in the Options tag, posted by Alexandre Lindote on Wed Nov 1 09:53:05 2006
|
[quote="Steve Jones"][quote="Alexandre Lindote"]Hi,
is it possible to run a shell script in an "Options" tag, as it is with the "Preset", "Subst", and so on?
|
|
Re: calling a shell in the Options tag, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Nov 9 20:59:01 2006
|
[quote="Alexandre Lindote"]Hi,
is it possible to run a shell script in an "Options" tag, as it is with the "Preset", "Subst", and so on?
|
|
Denial of Service Vulnerability of elog 2.6.2-6, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Nov 8 13:59:52 2006
|
Dear ELOG users,
a denial of service vulnerability has been reported which affects all elog versions prior to 2.6.2-7. With a special request one can crash the elogd server, |