Expand all at elog home, posted by Alex H on Wed Mar 16 16:13:15 2005
|
Hi,
Is there a command line in the configuration files to show all of sub logs
|
Re: Expand all at elog home, posted by Alex H on Fri Mar 25 12:49:13 2005 
|
> Hi,
>
> Is there a command line in the configuration files to show all of sub
|
Re: Expand all at elog home, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Mar 29 09:57:29 2005
|
> So I have posted a picture to explain better my question.
> So could it be possible to have the index page always expanded ?
> thanks for answers.
|
Re: Expand all at elog home, posted by Alex H on Wed Mar 30 15:12:54 2005
|
> > So I have posted a picture to explain better my question.
> > So could it be possible to have the index page always expanded ?
> > thanks for answers.
|
|
Unable to enter/edit time in user defined $date field?, posted by mark james on Tue Mar 22 12:03:04 2005
|
I have defined a new field called "Record Date" to accept the dates from a
previous logging system. I am not too concerned with the timestamp
associated with these old imported entries. But for new entries...
|
|
Re: Unable to enter/edit time in user defined $date field?, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Mar 22 13:46:57 2005
|
> I have defined a new field called "Record Date" to accept the dates from a
> previous logging system. I am not too concerned with the timestamp
> associated with these old imported entries. But for new entries...
|
|
Re: Unable to enter/edit time in user defined $date field?, posted by mark james on Tue Mar 22 23:27:21 2005
|
Stefan,
Oh. OK. I will keep tuned. It would be quite useful to have.
|
|
Re: Unable to enter/edit time in user defined $date field?, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Mar 30 11:07:08 2005
|
I implemented a "datetime" option which does exactly what you want. All you
need is a
|
wrong handling of attachment names, posted by Emiliano Gabrielli on Wed Mar 23 11:29:51 2005
|
When an attached image name contains a space in its filename and attachment
display is enabled elog builds a wrong url to the image:
|
|
Re: wrong handling of attachment names, posted by Emiliano Gabrielli on Wed Mar 23 12:54:51 2005
|
> When an attached image name contains a space in its filename and attachment
> display is enabled elog builds a wrong url to the image:
>
|
|
Re: wrong handling of attachment names, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Mar 23 20:35:55 2005
|
> When an attached image name contains a space in its filename and attachment
> display is enabled elog builds a wrong url to the image:
>
|
|
Re: wrong handling of attachment names, posted by Emiliano Gabrielli on Thu Mar 24 10:51:10 2005
|
> > When an attached image name contains a space in its filename and attachment
> > display is enabled elog builds a wrong url to the image:
> >
|
|
Re: wrong handling of attachment names, posted by Stefan Ritt on Fri Mar 25 00:33:51 2005
|
> It seems that uploading files with spaces in the name *now* works well... so the
> problem should be somewhere in the handling of existing attachments, not rised when
> the attachment is uploaded with the current version of elog ... it's quite strange
|
Re: wrong handling of attachment names, posted by Emiliano Gabrielli on Thu Mar 24 13:40:27 2005
|
> When an attached image name contains a space in its filename and attachment
> display is enabled elog builds a wrong url to the image:
>
|
|
Re: wrong handling of attachment names, posted by Stefan Ritt on Fri Mar 25 00:30:57 2005
|
> - Irestarted the daemon
> - attached strace to it
> - requested the list for a testin logbook, few entries some quite big images
|
|
Re: wrong handling of attachment names, posted by Emiliano Gabrielli on Tue Mar 29 11:49:29 2005
|
> > - Irestarted the daemon
> > - attached strace to it
> > - requested the list for a testin logbook, few entries some quite big images
|
|
Re: wrong handling of attachment names, posted by Emiliano Gabrielli on Tue Mar 29 16:21:32 2005
|
> > - Irestarted the daemon
> > - attached strace to it
> > - requested the list for a testin logbook, few entries some quite big images
|
|
Crash with Protect Selection page = 1, posted by Stephen A. Wood on Thu Mar 24 10:31:01 2005
|
Using 2.5.8, if I set "Protect Selection page" to 1, then elogd seg faults
as soon as it is accessed.
|
Re: Crash with Protect Selection page = 1, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Mar 24 10:39:00 2005
|
> Using 2.5.8, if I set "Protect Selection page" to 1, then elogd seg faults
> as soon as it is accessed.
|
|
Re: Crash with Protect Selection page = 1, posted by Emiliano Gabrielli on Thu Mar 24 11:00:59 2005
|
> > Using 2.5.8, if I set "Protect Selection page" to 1, then elogd seg faults
> > as soon as it is accessed.
>
|
|
Re: Crash with Protect Selection page = 1, posted by Emiliano Gabrielli on Thu Mar 24 11:01:06 2005
|
> > Using 2.5.8, if I set "Protect Selection page" to 1, then elogd seg faults
> > as soon as it is accessed.
>
|
|
Re: Crash with Protect Selection page = 1, posted by Stephen A. Wood on Thu Mar 24 11:28:13 2005
|
> > Using 2.5.8, if I set "Protect Selection page" to 1, then elogd seg faults
> > as soon as it is accessed.
>
|
|
Re: Crash with Protect Selection page = 1, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Mar 24 11:47:58 2005
|
> Logins work OK if the username/password is valid. However, if I try to login
> with invalid authentication, the server crashes. If I turn off the protect
> selection page, then invalid authentication does not crash elogd.
|
|
Re: Crash with Protect Selection page = 1, posted by Stephen A. Wood on Thu Mar 24 12:09:55 2005
|
> > Logins work OK if the username/password is valid. However, if I try to login
> > with invalid authentication, the server crashes. If I turn off the protect
> > selection page, then invalid authentication does not crash elogd.
|
|
Re: Crash with Protect Selection page = 1, posted by Alex H on Fri Mar 25 12:44:49 2005
|
> > > Logins work OK if the username/password is valid. However, if I try to login
> > > with invalid authentication, the server crashes. If I turn off the protect
> > > selection page, then invalid authentication does not crash elogd.
|
|
Re: Crash with Protect Selection page = 1, posted by Stefan Ritt on Fri Mar 25 18:25:59 2005
|
> > > > Logins work OK if the username/password is valid. However, if I try to login
> > > > with invalid authentication, the server crashes. If I turn off the protect
> > > > selection page, then invalid authentication does not crash elogd.
|
|
Database type logbook entry creation, posted by David Egolf on Thu Mar 24 20:36:50 2005
|
I would like to create a paper waste logbook. I need to have a column that
shows a weight in pounds and another column with a calculation from those
pounds to dollars. pounds x $4.00 = cost I was wondering if this was
|
|
Re: Database type logbook entry creation, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Mar 24 21:17:28 2005
|
> I would like to create a paper waste logbook. I need to have a column that
> shows a weight in pounds and another column with a calculation from those
> pounds to dollars. pounds x $4.00 = cost I was wondering if this was
|
|
HTML 4.1 transitional validation fails, posted by Emiliano Gabrielli on Mon Feb 7 18:55:02 2005
|
as this url shows http://www.htmlhelp.com/tools/validator/problems.html#amp
it should be used an HTML entity instead of the ampersand sign. |
|
Re: HTML 4.1 transitional validation fails, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon Feb 7 20:13:28 2005
|
> as this url shows http://www.htmlhelp.com/tools/validator/problems.html#amp
<br>
> it should be used an HTML entity instead of the ampersand sign.<p>
|
|
Re: HTML 4.1 transitional validation fails, posted by Emiliano Gabrielli on Thu Feb 24 11:23:44 2005
|
> > as this url shows http://www.htmlhelp.com/tools/validator/problems.html#amp
> <br>
> > it should be used an HTML entity instead of the ampersand sign.<p>
|
|
Re: HTML 4.1 transitional validation fails, posted by Emiliano Gabrielli on Thu Feb 24 12:44:29 2005
|
> > > as this url shows http://www.htmlhelp.com/tools/validator/problems.html#amp
> > <br>
> > > it should be used an HTML entity instead of the ampersand sign.<p>
|
|
Re: HTML 4.1 transitional validation fails, posted by Emiliano Gabrielli on Thu Feb 24 12:45:02 2005
|
> > > as this url shows http://www.htmlhelp.com/tools/validator/problems.html#amp
> > <br>
> > > it should be used an HTML entity instead of the ampersand sign.<p>
|
|
Re: HTML 4.1 transitional validation fails, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Mar 2 17:31:33 2005
|
> > I tried to substitute avery occurrence of hard coded "&" with "&" but it does
> > not do the job at all ... infact the first time the HTML code is ok, but
> > following a link let the browser to automatically decode html entities .. and
|
|
Re: HTML 4.1 transitional validation fails, posted by Emiliano Gabrielli on Tue Feb 8 13:11:30 2005
|
> as this url shows http://www.htmlhelp.com/tools/validator/problems.html#amp
<br>
> it should be used an HTML entity instead of the ampersand sign.<p>
|
|
Re: HTML 4.1 transitional validation fails, posted by Stefan Ritt on Sat Feb 12 17:40:55 2005
|
| I added ths missing tags. The validator at least does not complain any more. |
|
Re: HTML 4.1 transitional validation fails, posted by Emiliano Gabrielli on Thu Mar 24 13:21:28 2005
|
> as this url shows http://www.htmlhelp.com/tools/validator/problems.html#amp
> it should be used an HTML entity instead of the ampersand sign.
Stefan, the validation still fails on the ampersand ...
here is an example
of your online Demo elog:
http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1&uri=http%3A//midas.psi.ch/elogs/Forum/920 |
|
Re: HTML 4.1 transitional validation fails, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Mar 24 13:59:06 2005
|
> Stefan, the validation still fails on the ampersand ...
> here is an example of your online Demo elog:
> http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1&uri=http%3A//midas.psi.ch/elogs/Forum/920
|
|
New Debian package (2.5.8+r1592) -- needs testing, posted by Recai Oktas on Wed Mar 23 05:56:35 2005
|
Hi to all,
I've prepared a new Debian package. This version will probably be the one
|
Re: New Debian package (2.5.8+r1592) -- needs testing, posted by Emiliano Gabrielli on Wed Mar 23 11:19:51 2005
|
> Hi to all,
>
> I've prepared a new Debian package. This version will probably be the one
|
|
Re: New Debian package (2.5.8+r1592) -- needs testing, posted by Recai Oktas on Wed Mar 23 16:44:32 2005
|
> It seems to work nice to me.
> Just another suggestion: I think it would be better to insert a commented out
> example for all allowed parameters in the distributed /etc/default/elog
|
|
Re: New Debian package (2.5.8+r1592) -- needs testing, posted by Emiliano Gabrielli on Thu Mar 24 12:26:46 2005
|
> > It seems to work nice to me.
> > Just another suggestion: I think it would be better to insert a commented out
> > example for all allowed parameters in the distributed /etc/default/elog
|
|
Re: New Debian package (2.5.8+r1592) -- needs testing, posted by Emiliano Gabrielli on Thu Mar 24 12:30:07 2005
|
> Hi to all,
>
> I've prepared a new Debian package. This version will probably be the one
|
|
MOptions - How do I space them out, posted by mark james on Tue Mar 22 12:58:30 2005
|
I would like to increase the spacing between 'MOptions' choices. I have
created a new theme and have been playing with the CSS stylesheet. But can't
find how to increase this spacing. Having lots of fun otherwise!
|
|
Re: MOptions - How do I space them out, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Mar 22 13:29:44 2005
|
> I would like to increase the spacing between 'MOptions' choices. I have
> created a new theme and have been playing with the CSS stylesheet. But can't
> find how to increase this spacing. Having lots of fun otherwise!
|