Re: ELOG 3.0 plus and MS Windows issues., posted by William Wong on Wed Aug 5 23:36:29 2015
|
Thank you for recompiling ELOG. Unfortunately, there is no change in all the test machines
I ran the newly compiled ELOG 3.1.1-1 on. I will use the 2.x version until our systems move
to a new operating system or I can find someone in my IT department who knows how to compile programs |
Re: ELOG 3.0 plus and MS Windows issues., posted by Richard Stamper on Fri Aug 7 16:13:09 2015
|
William
Wong wrote:
Thank you for recompiling ELOG. Unfortunately, there is no change |
Re: Problem with elog and Internet Explorer when saving an entry, posted by TorstenJ on Mon Aug 10 12:02:27 2015
|
Hello Stefan,
thanks for you reply. I tried an ujpdate today to my old installation, but also after cleaning the IE cache, the problem consists. The same result
is, when doing a clean new installation, with the default elog.cfg and and cleaned cache as well an IE that was reseted to defaults. |
Re: Problem with elog and Internet Explorer when saving an entry, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Aug 12 10:54:27 2015
|
Do you have the problem on this Forum as well?
If not, then something is wrong with your installation. Like old JavaScipt files etc. Start with a fresh installation and you should be fine.
If you have the same problem in this Forum, let me know and I will further investigate it. |
Isolating search urls, posted by Philip Leung on Wed Aug 12 16:59:30 2015
|
Hello all,
I am in need of isolating GET-requests referring to long-running, read-only elog functions such as search/filter/sort in our Apache proxy and
redirecting them elsewhere. There does not, however, appear to be any easy way of reliably isolating these functions (with the exception of sort) by only |
Re: Isolating search urls, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Aug 12 17:19:45 2015
|
I guess the underlying problem is the long time these requests take and block other users.
I have pretty high on my todo list to convert ELOG into a multi-threaded server which would fix this completely. So if you are patient enough
(=months) you might get what you want. |
Show attachments = 0, posted by Eric Quintero on Wed Aug 12 23:44:16 2015
|
I have "Show attachments = 0" set in [global], but attachments are shown in the "Full" view. Is this the intended behavior?
Looking at individual entries correctly hides the attachments.
We use inline images often, so when an attachement is shown at the bottom of a post it is effectively a duplicate, which clutters things |
Re: Show attachments = 0, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Aug 13 08:41:57 2015
|
That's strange. If you use HTML or ELCode encoding, attachments are automatically hidden if they are used inline. So no "Show
attachments = 0" necessary! I just tried that with the demo logbook and here is how it looks:
|