Hello,

I noticed the wikipedia article of the ELOG got deleted in November 2021.
With the reason: "Poorly sourced article, and I was not able to find good sources myself."

I could access the old article through web.archive.org, but for the project it would be good, if the article got revived.

I agree. I ahead ;-) I think it is not a good idea if the ELOG author pushes on that, but better someone else.

Best,
Stefan

It looks to me like only an author of an article can contradict a deletion. I did not find a single method to even comment on the deletion.
I am not an Wikipedia expert, can anyone suggest on how to push for the article to be restored? Or do we just write it again, until people stop deleting it?

I have requested an undeletion of the article. The article was deleted  "PROD", which means that someone tagged it. And if noone removes the tag, it could be deleted.

I could revive the article. So in the future, One should have an eye on it and maybe update the current version of the software.

If there iy an paper on the elog, maybe it could be cited for more creditability.

It was now moved to the Draft space (which I did not even now existed so far): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:ELOG

I added some more references, that's about all I can do. Not sure if that is enough.

Stefan

If I understand it correctly I think it has to be submitted for review with the blue button on that page, just not sure if that should come from your side or someone else

It appears to me that this is a really stupid problem: the article provides many links to sources, but they are just links, not "references". That does not count, since links could be something else than references.

I'll try to edit it and transform the list of external links into references to verify the text. Lets hope that this will suffice.

Okay: found three articles about applications of ELOG and put them under references. I took the liberty to submit the draft: it shows that they expect some month delay for a review. I have no idea if that was what they want, but it is worth a try.

I am rather with John on this.

I deliberately stopped contributing to Wikipedia years ago after I added an observation to an entry.  That is, a piece of what could be called original research.  It was shot down in flames for being precisely that: original research.    From what I read in the Draft:Elog and the Talk section,  I think that the same issue in some guise or other will come up.  All of us use and love Elog - I think I use it for all of the listed purposes - but apart from being in the Debian distro (which I did not know about) there is very little published primary sources.  Mind you, the quality of publications as primary sources can be questioned, I can bore on with several examples.  

Has anyone ever published a paper citing their filing cabinet organisation?  Elog's obviously different, but has the same problem when it comes to citations.  It is a utility, a very useful one, but the sort of utility that might just make an aside in a paper these days.  If we were in the 1980s and (hypothetically) Elog was available and as functional, that would probably make it the subject in computer research papers and magazines. 

David.

I am still struggling to get ELOG running behind a load balancer and hope to get some advice here. As already reported in https://elog.psi.ch/elogs/Forum/69542 I observed an infinite loop of redirects when prompted to log in and using a non-empty password file. Without a password, the service worked as expected. This was with version 3.1.3.

With the new version 3.1.4-3, I get another error: "Invalid Content-Length in header" when I click on "submit" of a new post. Viewing the logbooks works fine. The instance is currently live and running here: https://elog.test.km3net.de but I might change it anytime due to debugging etc.

This is a kind of difficult thing to debug (I spent the whole day and no progress). The only thing I've found was this post: https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/iis-support-blog/invalid-content-length/ba-p/3038724 where it seems that some responses are not RFC conform and were rejected in the load-balancer.

The load balancer I use is HAProxy, the same as in my old setup where I got the infinite redirects, and I can't find any setting which would work. To my understanding, the most basic setup should work just fine. The SSL termination is on the load-balancer side so ELOG doesn't even have to know anything about it. The configuration is below. I am running a single instance, so there is not even replication with session keep-alive via cookies or anything fancy.

I also want to mention that I am runnin around 30 different services behind the load balancer and none of them are having any issues with the SSL termination or the load-balancing itself, that's why assume that something in ELOG is either non-conform or buggy.

Any thoughts? I'd really like to use the same infrastructure for the ELOG service as for every other service (automatic certificate renewal via letsencrypt, load-balancing, easy movement to other nodes, SSL termination etc.), to minimise the complexity of our Docker Swarm system.

backend be_elog.km3net.de
    mode http
    server-template km3net-elog- 1 km3net-elog_elog:8080 check resolvers docker init-addr libc,none

Btw. I am running ELOG with -v but I don't see any error whatsoever in the logs:

km3net-elog_elog.1.fm8i1eia9l9t@ecap-s021    | GET /demo/ HTTP/1.1
km3net-elog_elog.1.fm8i1eia9l9t@ecap-s021    | Received unknown cookie "ios_specific_templates_id"
km3net-elog_elog.1.fm8i1eia9l9t@ecap-s021    | Received unknown cookie "rl_anonymous_id"
km3net-elog_elog.1.fm8i1eia9l9t@ecap-s021    | Received unknown cookie "rl_group_id"
km3net-elog_elog.1.fm8i1eia9l9t@ecap-s021    | Received unknown cookie "rl_group_trait"
km3net-elog_elog.1.fm8i1eia9l9t@ecap-s021    | Received unknown cookie "rl_trait"
km3net-elog_elog.1.fm8i1eia9l9t@ecap-s021    | Received unknown cookie "rl_user_id"
km3net-elog_elog.1.fm8i1eia9l9t@ecap-s021    | Received unknown cookie "logged_out_marketing_header_id"
km3net-elog_elog.1.fm8i1eia9l9t@ecap-s021    | Returned 3437 bytes
km3net-elog_elog.1.fm8i1eia9l9t@ecap-s021    | GET / HTTP/1.1
km3net-elog_elog.1.fm8i1eia9l9t@ecap-s021    | Returned 120 bytes
km3net-elog_elog.1.fm8i1eia9l9t@ecap-s021    | GET /demo/ HTTP/1.1
km3net-elog_elog.1.fm8i1eia9l9t@ecap-s021    | Returned 3518 bytes
km3net-elog_elog.1.fm8i1eia9l9t@ecap-s021    | GET / HTTP/1.1
km3net-elog_elog.1.fm8i1eia9l9t@ecap-s021    | Returned 120 bytes
km3net-elog_elog.1.fm8i1eia9l9t@ecap-s021    | GET /demo/ HTTP/1.1
km3net-elog_elog.1.fm8i1eia9l9t@ecap-s021    | Returned 3518 bytes

I put the ELOG service behind an Apache reverse proxy which is now sitting behind the HAProxy. It works like this, but it's just a workaround. I am pretty sure that ELOG has problems to communicate with HAProxy correctly and it seems that Apache is more forgiving. So that the chain HAProxy -> Apache -> ELOG and vice versa is working.

If anyone manages to figure out what's wrong, I am happy to get rid of the extra reverse proxy layer!

After fiddling around I managed to get ELOG working behind the load balancer HAProxy by stacking ELOG together with an Apache reverse proxy in a Docker stack. I am currently pretty convinced that something with the HTTP communication is somehow faulty in ELOG and Apache is more forgiving than HAProxy, since the configuration is the same as without Apache. So putting ELOG behind an Apache and then Apache behind the HAProxy is working.

For the sake of completeness, here is the HAProxy configuration:

backend be_elog.km3net.de
    mode http
    server-template km3net-elog- 1 km3net-elog_apache:80 check resolvers docker init-addr libc,none

and here is the Apache httpd.conf:

Listen 80

LoadModule mpm_event_module modules/mod_mpm_event.so
LoadModule authn_core_module modules/mod_authn_core.so
LoadModule authz_core_module modules/mod_authz_core.so
LoadModule access_compat_module modules/mod_access_compat.so
LoadModule reqtimeout_module modules/mod_reqtimeout.so
LoadModule filter_module modules/mod_filter.so
LoadModule log_config_module modules/mod_log_config.so
LoadModule env_module modules/mod_env.so
LoadModule headers_module modules/mod_headers.so
LoadModule setenvif_module modules/mod_setenvif.so
LoadModule version_module modules/mod_version.so
LoadModule proxy_module modules/mod_proxy.so
LoadModule proxy_http_module modules/mod_proxy_http.so
LoadModule unixd_module modules/mod_unixd.so
LoadModule status_module modules/mod_status.so
LoadModule autoindex_module modules/mod_autoindex.so
<IfModule !mpm_prefork_module>
        #LoadModule cgid_module modules/mod_cgid.so
</IfModule>
<IfModule mpm_prefork_module>
        #LoadModule cgi_module modules/mod_cgi.so
</IfModule>
LoadModule dir_module modules/mod_dir.so
LoadModule alias_module modules/mod_alias.so
LoadModule rewrite_module modules/mod_rewrite.so

ServerAdmin email
ServerName elog.test.km3net.de

ErrorLog /proc/self/fd/2

LogLevel warn

<IfModule log_config_module>
    #
    # The following directives define some format nicknames for use with
    # a CustomLog directive (see below).
    #
    LogFormat "%h %l %u %t \"%r\" %>s %b \"%{Referer}i\" \"%{User-Agent}i\"" combined
    LogFormat "%h %l %u %t \"%r\" %>s %b" common

    <IfModule logio_module>
      # You need to enable mod_logio.c to use %I and %O
      LogFormat "%h %l %u %t \"%r\" %>s %b \"%{Referer}i\" \"%{User-Agent}i\" %I %O" combinedio
    </IfModule>

    #
    # The location and format of the access logfile (Common Logfile Format).
    # If you do not define any access logfiles within a <VirtualHost>
    # container, they will be logged here.  Contrariwise, if you *do*
    # define per-<VirtualHost> access logfiles, transactions will be
    # logged therein and *not* in this file.
    #
    CustomLog /proc/self/fd/1 common

    #
    # If you prefer a logfile with access, agent, and referer information
    # (Combined Logfile Format) you can use the following directive.
    #
    #CustomLog "logs/access_log" combined
</IfModule>

<IfModule headers_module>
    #
    # Avoid passing HTTP_PROXY environment to CGI's on this or any proxied
    # backend servers which have lingering "httpoxy" defects.
    # 'Proxy' request header is undefined by the IETF, not listed by IANA
    #
    RequestHeader unset Proxy early
</IfModule>

<VirtualHost *:80>
    ServerName elog.test.km3net.de
    #ProxyPreserveHost On
    ProxyPass / http://elog:8080/
    ProxyPassReverse / http://elog:8080/

    RewriteEngine On
    RewriteCond %{HTTP:Upgrade} =websocket [NC]
    RewriteRule /(.*)           ws://elog:8080/$1 [P,L]
    RewriteCond %{HTTP:Upgrade} !=websocket [NC]
    RewriteRule /(.*)           http://elog:8080/$1 [P,L]

    ErrorLog /apache/error.log
    CustomLog /apache/access.log combined
    TransferLog /apache/transfer.log
</VirtualHost>

Long story short: I am still not able to upload anything from the command line. So something like

elog -v -h elog.test.km3net.de -p 443 -l "Individual Logbooks" -v -m elog_test.txt  -n 0 -a author="Whoever" -a Subject="Upload Test" -u USER PWD -s

gives this:

root@b9db27a421e1:/# elog -v -h elog.test.km3net.de -p 443 -l "Individual Logbooks" -v -m elog_test.txt  -n 0 -a author="Whoever" -a Subject="Upload Test" -u USER PWD -s
Successfully connected to host elog.test.km3net.de, port 443
Possibly invalid certificate, continue on your own risk!
Request sent to host:
POST /Individual+Logbooks/ HTTP/1.0
Content-Type: multipart/form-data; boundary=---------------------------66D92EF0673838014927FA6E
Host: elog.test.km3net.de:443
User-Agent: ELOG
Content-Length: 977

Content sent to host:
---------------------------66D92EF0673838014927FA6E
Content-Disposition: form-data; name="cmd"

Submit
---------------------------66D92EF0673838014927FA6E
Content-Disposition: form-data; name="unm"

USER
---------------------------66D92EF0673838014927FA6E
Content-Disposition: form-data; name="upwd"

PWD_HASH
---------------------------66D92EF0673838014927FA6E
Content-Disposition: form-data; name="exp"

Individual Logbooks
---------------------------66D92EF0673838014927FA6E
Content-Disposition: form-data; name="encoding"

ELCode
---------------------------66D92EF0673838014927FA6E
Content-Disposition: form-data; name="author"

Whoever
---------------------------66D92EF0673838014927FA6E
Content-Disposition: form-data; name="Subject"

Upload Test
---------------------------66D92EF0673838014927FA6E
Content-Disposition: form-data; name="Text"

foo

---------------------------66D92EF0673838014927FA6E

Response received:
HTTP/1.1 503 Service Unavailable
content-length: 107
cache-control: no-cache
content-type: text/html
connection: close

<html><body><h1>503 Service Unavailable</h1>
No server is available to handle this request.
</body></html>

Error transmitting message

Is this command line interface even able to communicate through a(n Apache) reverse proxy or does it need to communicate with elogd directly?

We were running ELOG for many many years in our experiments and the instance was operated on a Debian XEN server as a container. I am now trying to migrate it into our Docker Swarm cluster and I am using the https://hub.docker.com/r/de1lz/elog-docker Docker image, which works very well with our logbooks when I run it as a single container. However, when I put the container behind my load balancer (HAProxy) using the simple HTTP mode (which works very well for all the other HTTP-based services) with this simple configuration:

backend be_elog.km3net.de
    mode http
    server-template km3net-elog- 1 km3net-elog_elog:8080 check resolvers docker init-addr libc,none

I get a "too many redirects" error when I try to access one of the logbooks. The starting page works fine, but every other link leads to a pile-up of redirects.

Here is the current instance running, where you can see the behaviour: https://elog.test.km3net.de (all log entries deleted and only two logbooks activated)

My question is: what kind of redirect could go wrong here? I don't know how the internal HTTP server of ELOG works, but maybe someone faced similar issues.

My ELOG configuration is also pretty basic, and as I wrote above, everything works when I run it without the load balancer (single instance at the moment). Here is the top part of the configuration, it contains a few dozens of logbooks but they are configured the very same way. 

;User Settings
;=============
Password file = login.xml
Admin user = km3net_admin
Self register = 0
Allow password change = 0
Allow config = km3net_admin

;Group Settings:
;====
Group ELOGKM3NET = Operations IT, Operations FR

[Operations IT]
Subdir = Operations_IT
Theme = default
Default encoding = 0
Comment = KM3NeT IT Detector Operations
Attributes = Author, Type, Subject
Options Author = A, B, C
Options Type = PPM-DOM, PPM-DU, Comment, Power cut, New run
Extendable Options = Type
Required Attributes = Author, Type, Subject
Page Title = ELOG - $subject
;Sort Attributes = Author, Type
Quick filter = Date, Type, Author
Resubmit default = 2
Reverse sort = 1
Menu commands = List, New, Edit, Reply, Duplicate, Find, Config, Help, Logout
Preset on first reply Subject = Re: $Subject
Preset on reply author =

Probably you need a setting

URL = https://elog.test.km3net.de

or so in your elogd.cfg file.

Stefan

Thanks for the quick reply! Sorry, I forgot to paste the "global" part of the config, I have that URL already set:

[global]
;Main Settings
;=============
Usr = elog
Grp = elog
port = 8080
SSL = 0
URL = https://elog.test.km3net.de
Title image = <img border=0 src="KM3NeT_logo.png" alt="KM3NeT logo" height="35px">
;SMTP host = smtp.fau.de
Display mode = summary
Thumbnail size = 500>
List Menu text = clock.html
Menu text = clock.html

I also tried the default configuration (example config) and it that works behind the load balancer. So I guess it's related to the password-page, which causes this redirect loop? Our logbooks are all password protected, so when a logbook URL is clicked, it should first present the login-form, and that's where it chokes.

Yeah, after you enter a password, elog redirects to what it finds in "URL". You can trace that by opening "development tools" in Google Chrome, go to "network" and watch packets going back and forth. I never worked with the load balancer, but maybe you need a different "URL" containing a '/' at the end?

My problem is that I don't even reach the page where I can enter a password. If you go to https://elog.test.km3net.de and click on a logbook, you'll see that it immediately goes into a redirect loop. I already logged the routing but there is nothing else...

Attached is the log, where you can see that `Operations+IT` redirects to `Operations+IT/` and that redirects to `Operations+IT` again, which then goes to `elog.test.km3net.de` and `Operations+IT` again etc. etc.

EDIT: I  use the very same load balancer confugration for dozens of other services incl. Apache, Nginx, GitLab, Mattermost, RocketChat etc. and all work fine. As written before, also the "example" logbook works (without password protection).

I also tried `/` at the end of the URL but it has no effect.

I am pretty clueless currently...

Yes I see the redirects. You say with the example logbook it works, right? Is it the password protection which triggers the problem or anything else? Does it work if you take out the password protection? The key is to identify which setting in your config file triggers the problem, so you can bracket the problem down between the example logbook and your logbook definition.

Yes, I used the empty `passwd` file from example. When I then click on one of the logbooks, I get to the page where I can register a user (see attached screenshot). After clickin on "Save" for the user registration, I again get the redirect error. Once there is a registered user (i.e. a non-empty password file) the redirect issue is persistent. Any idea where the problem might be? I just emptied the password file again, so you can have a one-shot, if you like.

Btw. I have SSL termination in the load balancer, so ELOG does not need to do any SSL related things (the swarm is in a locally isolated network, so all internal communication between the load balancer and the swarm machines are safe). Maybe that's the issue? On the other hand, the main page loads fine and uses SSL termination too, so I don't know, maybe there is logic behind the authentication which collides with the SSL termination.

The issue is still present and now it's quite urgent to move this last service into the Swarm. Does anyone maybe have an idea what's wrong? To sum up: if there is a non-empty password file, the login page chokes in an infinite loop of redirects. I am using the same HAProxy load balancer configuration as for all the other services (running Apache, NGINX, GitLab, XWiki, etc.):

backend be_elog.km3net.de
    mode http

    option forwardfor except 127.0.0.1
    http-request add-header X-Forwarded-Proto https if { ssl_fc }

    server-template km3net-elog- 1 km3net-elog_elog:8080 check resolvers docker init-addr libc,none

Dear Stefan, 

There is a problem with editing an Elog page in "plain" format with the following "User Agent" :

"Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/605.1.15 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/16.1 Safari/605.1.15"

It duplicates the newline symbols such that "1<CRLF>2" becomes "1<CRLF><CRLF>2". If edited again - "1<CRLF><CRLF><CRLF><CRLF>2".

I blame the new version of the Apple WebKit. 

It works fine with Chrome (user agent: "Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/108.0.0.0 Safari/537.36"). But fails with Safari. 
 

Could you please have a look? 

Thank you in advance, 

Andrey Pashnin

AMS collaboration

It shound't be a "bug report", sorry. I have changed the category to "Info".

It seems to be really a bug in the WebKit core. I have created a bug report there. For reference: https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=249923

I am going to try to patch the ELOG code to handle the content of the textarea in the "plain" format.... it doesn't seem possible though. 

FYI.

Removing "wrap=hard" on the line #11461 in the elogd.cxx file resolves my problem.

- rsprintf("<textarea rows=%d cols=%d wrap=hard name=\"Text\">\n", height, width);*/
+ rsprintf("<textarea rows=%d cols=%d name=\"Text\">\n", height, width);

- rsprintf("<textarea rows=%d cols=%d wrap=hard name=\"Text\">\n", height, width);
+ rsprintf("<textarea rows=%d cols=%d name=\"Text\">\n", height, width);

my vote is to remove "wrap=hard":

1) I try to read the specs and my head explodes: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Element/textarea
2) textarea should just accept input typed by user, should not try to "neatify" it. if user wants long lines, we should let them.
3) this bug (introduced in recent safari, the best I can tell)

K.O.

FYI

They seem to have accepted the bug report:
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=249923

> - rsprintf("<textarea rows=%d cols=%d wrap=hard name=\"Text\">\n", height, width);
> + rsprintf("<textarea rows=%d cols=%d name=\"Text\">\n", height, width);
> 
> my vote is to remove "wrap=hard":
> 
> 1) I try to read the specs and my head explodes: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Element/textarea
> 2) textarea should just accept input typed by user, should not try to "neatify" it. if user wants long lines, we should let them.
> 3) this bug (introduced in recent safari, the best I can tell)
> 
> K.O.

I agree with K.O. Does anybody see a problem in removing "wrap=hard"? 

It was there more for historical reasons. In the old days screens were not so wide and wrapping was more of an issue.
People tended to write longer lines and complained that the long lines got reformatted differently for different screen
sizes. So by adding hard CRLF the formatting looked the same on different screens. These days this is not such an issue
any more and I agree with 2) above. If the user wants a long line, the user should get it.

Stefan

Ahh, now I remember. Well, the I put that in like 25 years ago ;-)

Let's assume the user write a very long line and relies on the wrapping of the text box. So the input might look like the 
first attachment. Then the user hits submit and gets just one long line (second attachment) and has to scroll one kilometre
to the right to see the full line. So there is an inconsistency between the entry form and what the user sees after the
submission. Having "wrap=hard" tells the browser to put CRLF where the wrapping in the textarea happens, so the text looks
the same during entry and after submission. If we remove the "wrap=hard", we would be back to the situation below in the two
attachments.

Opinions?

Stefan

oh! so, that's the cause of another problem I faced a while ago. 
When people edited an ELOG page on a narrow screen device (a.k.a smartphone) it put the extra CRLF and made the page look like the attachment below 
(it broke the original formatting).

I had to "fix" this by setting the width of the textarea to a huge number... 

However, removing "wrap=hard" solves both these problems! ;)

Yepp, that's right. But without the "wrap=hard", you could get one single long line which is almost impossible to read. So there is no perfect solution for all cases. I see three options

1) Remove "wrap=hard" and let the user do as the user wants. This can lead to very long lines almost impossible to read.
2) Keep "wrap=hard" and rely on the browser to put in CRLF between lines according to the textarea box during input. The result will then be the same as during editing. Of course this might 
require to make the textarea width wide enough on small screens not to get too many CRLFs. The default "Message width" is 78 chars, but on modern browsers some JavaScript code automatically sets 
the width to equal the screen width which normally is wider.
3) Add artificial CRCL like every 40 or 80 chars. This is the "beautifying" K.O. mentioned and will never be perfect. Not sure if elog should touch the text the user enters.

Looking at the three options, I kind of conclude that 2) would still be the best.

Stefan

How about adding a config option? 
Ideally, it might be nice to have this option "per record" or "per logbook", but "per instance" should be good enough.

Ok, I added an option

Hard wrap = 0 | 1

with the default being "1", so same behaviour as before. If you set this now to zero, you turn it off.

Now waiting for the first people complaining about the very long lines not being readable...

Best,
Stefan

That's great! Thank you very much. 

I'm sorry for being annoying... 
but I have tried to wrap the <pre> tag in a <div> and it seems to do the trick
(the text is a single line with repeating aaa-b-cc sequence)

In the READ mode, the width is limited by the div's width 
(see the first attachment)

In the EDIT mode, the width is only limited by the textarea width
(see the second attachment)

All this is with "wrap=hard" removed. 

Didn't work for me. The text is just truncated after the width and no extra lines are added.

Sorry, I forgot to mention that I also added some styles to the <pre> tag:
style="white-space: normal"
(see the screenshot on my previous post)

> Sorry, I forgot to mention that I also added some styles to the <pre> tag:
> style="white-space: normal"
> (see the screenshot on my previous post)

Actually the

style="white-space: normal"

makes the difference, the <div> is not necessary at all!

But I'm not sure that "white-space: normal" is what we want. All manual line breaks in an entry are collapsed and you get just one text block without any new line. See here

https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/white-space

I guess we want "white-space: pre-wrap" which keeps the old line breaks.

You can try that out by changing elog.css:

--- a/themes/default/elog.css
+++ b/themes/default/elog.css
@@ -475,6 +475,7 @@ td {

 .messagepre {
   font-family:'lucida console',courier,monospace;
+  white-space:pre-wrap;
 }

and see the effect. If you like it, just keep it. No need to recompile elogd.cxx.

Stefan

> I guess we want "white-space: pre-wrap" which keeps the old line breaks.

Yep. You're right. Thanks!

Hello, the following URL

https://foo.bar/elog/Shift+Reports/?new_user_name=a2seferewd@fonomsdfef.coma2seferewd@fonomsdfef.coma2seferewd@fonomsdfef.coma2seferewd@fonomsdfef.coma2seferewd@fonomsdfef.coma2seferewd@fonomsdfef.coma2seferewd@fonomsdfef.coma2seferewd@fonomsdfef.coma2seferewd@fonomsdfef.coma2seferewd@fonomsdfef.coma2seferewd@fonomsdfef.coma2seferewd@fonomsdfef.coma2seferewd@fonomsdfef.coma2seferewd@fonomsdfef.coma2seferewd@fonomsdfef.coma2seferewd@fonomsdfef.coma2seferewd@fonomsdfef.coma2seferewd@fonomsdfef.coma2seferewd@fonomsdfef.coma2seferewd@fonomsdfef.coma2seferewd@fonomsdfef.coma2seferewd@fonomsdfef.com&new_full_name=a2seferewd%40fanneat.com&new_user_email=a2seferewd%40fanneat.com&newpwd=asdf&newpwd2=asdf&cmd=Save

causes elog 3.1.4 to crash. I attach full GDB trace

(gdb) set height 0
(gdb) set print elements 0
(gdb) set print frame-arguments all
(gdb) thread apply all backtrace

Thread 1 (Thread 0x7fc6d1624840 (LWP 1126)):
#0  0x00007fc6d06c6387 in raise () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#1  0x00007fc6d06c7a78 in abort () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#2  0x00007fc6d0708f67 in __libc_message () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#3  0x00007fc6d07a87a7 in __fortify_fail () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#4  0x00007fc6d07a6922 in __chk_fail () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#5  0x00007fc6d07a5e2b in _IO_str_chk_overflow () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#6  0x00007fc6d070d031 in __GI__IO_default_xsputn () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#7  0x00007fc6d06dd033 in vfprintf () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#8  0x00007fc6d07a5eb8 in __vsprintf_chk () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#9  0x00007fc6d07a5e0d in __sprintf_chk () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#10 0x0000000000423b5b in sprintf (__fmt=<optimized out>, __s=<optimized out>) at /usr/include/bits/stdio2.h:33
#11 get_user_line (lbs=<optimized out>, lbs@entry=0x2833748, 
    user=user@entry=0x7fffc84d0780 "a2seferewd@fonomsdfef.coma2seferewd@fonomsdfef.coma2seferewd@fonomsdfef.coma2seferewd@fonomsdfef.coma2seferewd@fonomsdfef.coma2seferewd@fonomsdfef.coma2seferewd@fonomsdfef.coma2seferewd@fonomsdfef.coma2seferewd@fonomsdfef.coma2seferewd@fonomsdfef.combasar", password=password@entry=0x0, full_name=full_name@entry=0x0, email=email@entry=0x0, email_notify=email_notify@entry=0x0, 
    last_logout=last_logout@entry=0x0, inactive=inactive@entry=0x0) at src/elogd.c:25739
#12 0x0000000000433d0a in save_user_config (lbs=lbs@entry=0x2833748, 
    user=0x7704fc <_value+1500> "a2seferewd@fonomsdfef.coma2seferewd@fonomsdfef.coma2seferewd@fonomsdfef.coma2seferewd@fonomsdfef.coma2seferewd@fonomsdfef.coma2seferewd@fonomsdfef.coma2seferewd@fonomsdfef.coma2seferewd@fonomsdfef.coma2seferewd@fonomsdfef.coma2seferewd@fonomsdfef.coma2seferewd@fonomsdfef.coma2seferewd@fonomsdfef.coma2seferewd@fonomsdfef.coma2seferewd@fonomsdfef.coma2seferewd@fonomsdfef.coma2seferewd@fonomsdfef.coma2seferewd@fonomsdfef.coma2seferewd@fonomsdfef.coma2seferewd@fonomsdfef.coma2seferewd@fonomsdfef.coma2seferewd@fonomsdfef.coma2seferewd@fonomsdfef.com", new_user=new_user@entry=1) at src/elogd.c:13343
#13 0x0000000000456068 in do_self_register (lbs=0x2833748, command=0x7fffc84d2650 "Save") at src/elogd.c:26768
#14 0x000000000045c1f7 in interprete (lbook=lbook@entry=0x7fffc84f92f0 "Shift Reports", path=path@entry=0x7fffc84d4430 "") at src/elogd.c:27594
#15 0x000000000045ecc6 in decode_get (logbook=logbook@entry=0x7fffc84f92f0 "Shift Reports", string=<optimized out>) at src/elogd.c:28393
#16 0x0000000000460970 in process_http_request (request=<optimized out>, 
    request@entry=0x284bee8 "GET /Shift+Reports/?new_user_name=a2seferewd%402sefddsfgfd.coma2seferewd%402sefddsfgfd.coma2seferewd%402sefddsfgfd.coma2seferewd%402sefddsfgfd.coma2seferewd%402sefddsfgfd.coma2seferewd%402sefddsfgfd.coma2seferewd%402sefddsfgfd.coma2seferewd%402sefddsfgfd.coma2seferewd%402sefddsfgfd.coma2seferewd%402sefddsfgfd.coma2seferewd%402sefddsfgfd.coma2seferewd%402sefddsfgfd.coma2seferewd%402sefddsfgfd.coma2seferewd%402sefddsfgfd.coma2seferewd%402sefddsfgfd.coma2seferewd%402sefddsfgfd.coma2seferewd%402sefddsfgfd.coma2seferewd%402sefddsfgfd.coma2seferewd%402sefddsfgfd.coma2seferewd%402sefddsfgfd.coma2seferewd%402sefddsfgfd.coma2seferewd%402sefddsfgfd.com&new_full_name=a2seferewd%40fanneat.com&new_user_email=a2seferewd%40fanneat.com&newpwd=asdf&newpwd2=asdf&cmd=Save", i_conn=i_conn@entry=1) at src/elogd.c:29201
#17 0x00000000004623d2 in server_loop () at src/elogd.c:30212
#18 0x0000000000404209 in main (argc=8, argv=0x7fffc84fb6c8) at src/elogd.c:3123

I added a user name validation in the current version.

Stefan

Dear All,

Just want to come back to this issue I faced.

In the config file, I call an html form to format input. The way I call the html file inside my config file is described below.

My point is, even if I am already logged in, each time I try to submit an html form, it sais I am not logged in ...

please refer to the corresponding form to see the screenshots.

Many thanks

Hayg

------->

that is strange since I logged in ... 

It seems like when I go in the shift check topic in the elog, it does not get my login id ... is there something coming from the HTML file that should be set in order to get the login from elog ?

see in the attached image : I am logged in but I still need to feed the Author item. And even If I fill it, 

And then if I Click on new to write a new filling form, author is not filled as you could see on the second image "Author ?"  ...

so I don' see from where appears the problem

When you log in manually to a logbook, a session ID is created and stored in a cookie "sid". On your shift check list you need some code to copy this session ID into your current form. In the code form 2010, I used "unm" and "upwd", but this was removed since it's not safe. So now you need somethign like:

<input type="hidden" name="sid" id="sid">

and

document.getElementById('sid').value = get_cookie('sid');

in your init code.

I haven't tried that in the past 12 years so no guarantee that it should work.

Stefan

I think this is a bug report. 
However, I am not sure whether the problem is in the new version of Apple's WebKit (15.4) or in the ELOG itself.

When we edit an ELOG record with Safari (as of version 15.4, new WebKit features added) the number of "newline" symbols (actually LF, 0xA) are doubled.

So, for instance, if I edit the following page (1 LF symbol between "aaa" and "bbb"):
```
aaa
bbb
```

then after a "Submit" (without actually any changes) the record becomes (2 LF symbols):

```
aaa

bbb
```

then after a "Submit" (without actually any changes) the record becomes (4 LF symbols in between):
```
aaa



bbb
```

NOTE: The LF symbol at the end (after the "bbb" line) does NOT get duplicated (it gets truncated, I believe).


Our current ELOG version is "ELOG V3.1.4-4936b76".
Could you please have a look? 

I have just setup a new ELOG server on another machine. I took the latest source code from here: http://elog.psi.ch/elog/download/tar/elog-latest.tar.gz. Compiled it and ran. 
Still the same problem with Safari.

see https://elog.psi.ch/elogs/Forum/69594

I added a reply to my previous post about this issue (a few months ago) to point to the solution, but ELOG moved it to the top of the forum. 
And I cannot delete this now, because I change my user name from "Andrey" to "Andrey Pashnin" :)

"Only user Andrey can delete this entry"