Formatting parameters for attributes, posted by Ulrich Trüssel on Fri Jun 25 20:09:21 2004
|
I have some problems of understanding how the "Format <attribute>" parameter
is working. It may be, that there was a similar question in the forum, but I
didn't find it. I'm sorry if I come back with an old question.
|
Re: Formatting parameters for attributes, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Jul 7 16:00:10 2004
|
> I have some problems of understanding how the "Format <attribute>" parameter
> is working. It may be, that there was a similar question in the forum, but I
> didn't find it. I'm sorry if I come back with an old question.
|
Re: Formatting parameters for attributes, posted by Ulrich Trüssel on Fri Jul 9 19:17:03 2004
|
Thank you Stefan! Just was out of the office for some days.
There ar 2 questions in addition:
|
|
Re: Formatting parameters for attributes, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon Jul 12 10:36:22 2004
|
> 1. Is there a possiblity to fix the position of the attribut fields if they are in
> the same line? As. ex. if one attribute is empty or contain a very short value it may
> be possible that the position of the following atrributes in the line are moving to
|
Re: Formatting parameters for attributes, posted by Ulrich Trüssel on Mon Jul 12 11:03:10 2004
|
Thank you Stefan!
1. Will help in the real hard cases!
|
ELOG & Selection Page, posted by G on Tue Jul 6 23:37:02 2004 
|
Hello to all,
I'm trying to get ELOG to run several separate logbooks which will
|
|
Re: ELOG & Selection Page, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Jul 8 22:01:06 2004
|
> The problem I have is I want to have a main selection type page so when a
> user enters ELOG they see this page with links on it to main logbook groups.
|
|
Re: ELOG & Selection Page, posted by G on Thu Jul 8 23:41:43 2004
|
Great! That takes care of the problem for sure.
Cheers once again for such a quick response.
|
|
Only show log entries for logged-in user, posted by Bartjan Wattel on Wed Jun 30 11:59:57 2004
|
Hi,
Is it possible to restrict the display of logbook entries to the entries
|
|
Re: Only show log entries for logged-in user, posted by Ralph Kuehn on Wed Jun 30 14:59:06 2004
|
One way would be to create a seperate logbook for each student including the
teacher. It should then be fairly simple to set up the permissions however you
would like. For a large class it might be a bit cumbersome to set it up this way.
|
|
Re: Only show log entries for logged-in user, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Jul 7 16:43:52 2004
|
> For a large class it might be a bit cumbersome to set it up this way.
What you can do is put most of the configuration options into the [global] section,
|
Using date and subst date, posted by nait tauh on Fri May 14 06:19:40 2004
|
I'm trying capture any edit/modified entry with the following, Using the
real date format instead of text string so that I could do a quick filter on it.
|
|
Re: Using date and subst date, posted by Stefan Ritt on Fri May 21 15:03:48 2004
|
> I'm trying capture any edit/modified entry with the following, Using the
> real date format instead of text string so that I could do a quick filter on it.
>
|
|
Re: Using date and subst date, posted by nait tauh on Sat May 29 04:23:58 2004
|
> I fixed that problem, new version under
> http://midas.psi.ch/cgi-bin/cvsweb/elog/src/elogd.c?rev=1.328
|
|
Re: Using date and subst date, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Jun 2 15:13:12 2004
|
>
> > I fixed that problem, new version under
> > http://midas.psi.ch/cgi-bin/cvsweb/elog/src/elogd.c?rev=1.328
|
|
Re: Using date and subst date, posted by nait tauh on Thu Jun 3 17:15:56 2004
|
> http://midas.psi.ch/elog/download/windows/elogd-snapshot.exe
>
> is for windows, for linux you have to recompile with
|
|
Re: Using date and subst date, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Jun 3 17:28:07 2004
|
> > http://midas.psi.ch/elog/download/windows/elogd-snapshot.exe
> >
> > is for windows, for linux you have to recompile with
|
|
Re: Using date and subst date, posted by nait tauh on Thu Jun 3 18:28:02 2004
|
> Looks like a weird Linux installation. Maybe try to link static:
>
|
|
Re: Using date and subst date, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Jun 3 20:22:47 2004
|
> Now I have more error. ;(
>
> Maybe you can post your elogd build.... just for me. :)
|
|
Re: Using date and subst date, posted by nait tauh on Fri Jun 4 16:43:34 2004
|
> I compiled one (just for you :))), available at
>
> http://midas.psi.ch/elog/download/tar/elogd-snapshot.gz
|
Re: Using date and subst date, posted by nait tauh on Wed Jun 16 10:47:26 2004
|
>
> Thank you very much.... it work.
> nait.
|
|
Re: Using date and subst date, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Jun 16 14:42:07 2004
|
> It has a bug. The filter will fail on the initial page of the logbook.
>
> example,
|
|
Re: Using date and subst date, posted by nait tauh on Wed Jun 16 15:57:02 2004
|
>
> You should, it has been fixed in 2.5.3 :-)))
|
|
Mail notification without attachment possible?, posted by nait tauh on Sat May 29 04:28:38 2004
|
I just noticed the problem of mail notification with big attachments. For a
files or photos exchange setup we could run into load and bandwidth problem
quickly. Any way to restrict mail notification by attributes or without
|
|
Re: Mail notification without attachment possible?, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Jun 3 22:05:37 2004
|
> I just noticed the problem of mail notification with big attachments. For a
> files or photos exchange setup we could run into load and bandwidth problem
> quickly. Any way to restrict mail notification by attributes or without
|
|
Re: Mail notification without attachment possible?, posted by nait tauh on Wed Jun 16 10:34:04 2004
|
> Use
>
> Email format = 6
|
|
Re: Mail notification without attachment possible?, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Jun 16 14:36:04 2004
|
> > Use
> >
> > Email format = 6
|
Using select menu option to move multiple logbook entries to another logbook, posted by Robin Peterson on Fri Jun 4 22:40:44 2004
|
I'm trying to configure this thing to be able to filter on a set of
criteria, choose select, choose toggle all, and then choose "Move to
Complete Work Requests".
|
|
Re: Using select menu option to move multiple logbook entries to another logbook, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon Jun 7 15:58:10 2004
|
> I've been able to select a specific logbook entry and move it, and I've
> been able to filter and select and toggle, but I can't figure out how to
> get the Move To option to show up on the main logbook menu....
|
|
Resubmit as new entry, posted by miljan dedic on Thu Jun 3 22:22:33 2004
|
Hello,
Elogd crashing when "Resubmit as new entry" is executed.
Tried with demo config, same result, also tried with snapshot version.
|
|
Re: Resubmit as new entry, posted by Stefan Ritt on Fri Jun 4 16:55:36 2004
|
> Elogd crashing when "Resubmit as new entry" is executed.
> Tried with demo config, same result, also tried with snapshot version.
> After the first crash i restart elogd, then it crashes every time i enter
|
|
Extendable options, posted by Marc Neiger on Mon May 10 00:00:06 2004
|
Hi,
the use of extendable options in the global section seem to "crash" elogd
|
|
Re: Extendable options, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon May 10 21:57:49 2004
|
> the use of extendable options in the global section seem to "crash" elogd
> when creating a new entry.
> My elogd.cfg is included
|
|
Re: Extendable options, posted by Marc Neiger on Tue May 11 10:42:44 2004
|
Hi Stefan,
Many thanks, it works. I'm impressed by your reactivity ! thanks again.
|
|
Re: Extendable options, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue May 11 10:44:55 2004
|
> Is it possible to have a conditionnal attribute depend on an extendanble one ?
In principle yes, but I never tried it... |
|
Re: Extendable options, posted by Marc Neiger on Tue May 11 11:08:33 2004
|
> > Is it possible to have a conditionnal attribute depend on an extendanble one ?
>
> In principle yes, but I never tried it...
|
|
Re: Extendable options, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue May 11 11:18:24 2004
|
> The snapshot version you sent me seems to be locked onto port 80 and does not honor
> the port directive in elog.cfg....
|
|
Re: Extendable options, posted by Marc Neiger on Tue May 11 19:35:11 2004
|
> > The snapshot version you sent me seems to be locked onto port 80 and does not honor
> > the port directive in elog.cfg....
>
|