New Version, posted by Nick on Tue Feb 18 08:07:10 2003
|
I noticed the site has been updated as far as the documentation for 2.3.1,
however the latest version in the downloads section is 2.3.0, any other
places where I can get 2.3.1
|
|
Re: New Version, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Feb 18 09:21:34 2003
|
> I noticed the site has been updated as far as the documentation for 2.3.1,
> however the latest version in the downloads section is 2.3.0, any other
> places where I can get 2.3.1
|
Lost features since upgrade to 2.3.0, posted by Nick on Fri Feb 7 18:38:56 2003
|
Ive got 2 issues which I cant see to resolve I was wondering if anyone can
help.
|
Re: Lost features since upgrade to 2.3.0, posted by Stefan Ritt on Fri Feb 7 19:52:41 2003
|
> Problem 1 - Since upgrading to version 2.3.0 I seem to have lost the some
> functionality explained below. When i first log into my logbook (i only
> have a single one) it defaults to the summary view and the first field is
|
|
Re: Lost features since upgrade to 2.3.0, posted by Nick on Fri Feb 7 22:26:13 2003
|
> I revised the way links are placed into the summary table, so I could have
> lost some functionality (I did not try all config combinations since there
> are too many now). So I can fix your problem in two ways now: Either always
|
|
Re: Lost features since upgrade to 2.3.0, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Feb 11 09:03:18 2003
|
> Would be nice if you can specify which columns data has links as a flag or
> setting of some sorts, as opposed to either the first or all, but given a
> choice I would want the first column to be the linkable one
|
|
Re: Lost features since upgrade to 2.3.0, posted by Nick on Tue Feb 11 11:17:29 2003
|
> > > > Problem 2 - no matter what i try in the config file i cannot get
elogd
> to
|
|
Re: Lost features since upgrade to 2.3.0, posted by Kutlay Topatan on Wed Feb 12 19:10:26 2003
|
Stefan,
When will you have 2.3.1 out? I just upgraded to 2.3.0 and would like to see
|
|
Re: Lost features since upgrade to 2.3.0, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Feb 12 19:54:21 2003
|
> When will you have 2.3.1 out? I just upgraded to 2.3.0 and would like to
see
> the links in my summary view. If it is going to be out soon I will wait
|
Find , posted by eric wooten on Mon Feb 10 23:36:31 2003
|
When you do a find in elog, records per page (some crazy large number - for
your forum logbook, display 57 entries seem to cause the problem, then
select last year (1 years worth of logs),(don't select printable)
|
|
Re: Find , posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Feb 12 08:56:29 2003
|
> When you do a find in elog, records per page (some crazy large number - for
> your forum logbook, display 57 entries seem to cause the problem, then
> select last year (1 years worth of logs),(don't select printable)
|
|
Feature request, posted by Nick on Tue Feb 11 11:26:03 2003
|
Can you consider implementing the following additions to the functionality
1) Subt on edit <attribute> = xyz
|
|
Re: Feature request, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Feb 11 11:45:22 2003
|
> Can you consider implementing the following additions to the functionality
>
> 1) Subt on edit <attribute> = xyz
|
|
Re: Feature request, posted by Nick on Wed Feb 12 01:11:08 2003
|
> > Can you consider implementing the following additions to the functionality
> >
> > 1) Subt on edit <attribute> = xyz
|
|
Re: Feature request, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Feb 12 08:54:05 2003
|
> > > Can you consider implementing the following additions to the
functionality
> > >
|
|
elog notification process causes the email to be truncated when going to Blackberry, posted by eric wooten on Mon Feb 10 23:05:36 2003
|
Hi Stefan,
Many users have there email forward to Blackberry devices. Although I
|
|
Re: elog notification process causes the email to be truncated when going to Blackberry, posted by eric wooten on Mon Feb 10 23:11:25 2003
|
Another Question: Could ELOG be configured to send notifications as a Blind
Copy? Just wondering if that would take care of the problem?
|
|
Re: elog notification process causes the email to be truncated when going to Blackberry, posted by eric wooten on Mon Feb 10 23:19:50 2003
|
I just noticed that the notifications I receive from your ELOG system,
doesn't show anyone in the "TO:" section but myself. Or is ELOG configured
to only send myself a message?
|
|
Re: elog notification process causes the email to be truncated when going to Blackberry, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Feb 11 08:57:39 2003
|
> I just noticed that the notifications I receive from your ELOG system,
> doesn't show anyone in the "TO:" section but myself. Or is ELOG
configured
|
|
Author attribute as a Quick Filter?, posted by eric wooten on Thu Feb 6 15:16:30 2003
|
When ELOG is configured for Self-Register=3, is it still possible
to use the Author attribute as a Quick Filter?
|
|
Re: Author attribute as a Quick Filter?, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Feb 6 15:46:11 2003
|
> When ELOG is configured for Self-Register=3, is it still possible
> to use the Author attribute as a Quick Filter?
>
|
|
Write only, posted by Matthew on Thu Jan 30 19:52:46 2003
|
I'm interested using elog for a lab notebook. Once entries have been
entered they cannot be changed/edited.
Is it possible for elog to be setup to support something like this? A write
|
|
Re: Write only, posted by Stefan Ritt on Fri Jan 31 09:49:43 2003
|
> I'm interested using elog for a lab notebook. Once entries have been
> entered they cannot be changed/edited.
> Is it possible for elog to be setup to support something like this? A write
|
|
Re: Write only, posted by Matthew on Fri Jan 31 20:47:51 2003
|
Does this truly disable the edit command or just hide it?
> > I'm interested using elog for a lab notebook. Once entries have been
|
|
Re: Write only, posted by Stefan Ritt on Fri Jan 31 21:09:47 2003
|
> Does this truly disable the edit command or just hide it?
You're right! In some earlier versions, it did disable it, but in 2.2.5 it
|
confused name in the attributes section, posted by Etienne Van Caillie on Tue Jan 21 10:04:46 2003 
|
do not use confused name in attributes
**************************************
like
|
|
Re: confused name in the attributes section, posted by Stefan Ritt on Fri Jan 24 12:24:18 2003
|
> do not use confused name in attributes
> **************************************
> like
|