Error while trying to change password (elogd 2.1.0), posted by Stefan Siegel on Mon Aug 12 11:01:51 2002
|
When logging in with a username and password; then trying to logout or
change password one gets the following message:
Error: Parameter value too big. Please increase VALUE_SIZE and recompile
elogd ; Please use your browser's back button to go back
(up to now I have not yet tried to recompile - may be it works then)
Regards,
Stefan |
Re: Error while trying to change password (elogd 2.1.0), posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon Aug 12 17:04:30 2002
|
> When logging in with a username and password; then trying to logout or
> change password one gets the following message:
>
> Error: Parameter value too big. Please increase VALUE_SIZE and recompile
> elogd ; Please use your browser's back button to go back
>
> (up to now I have not yet tried to recompile - may be it works then)
That's strange. This error should only occur if someone uses a user name or
password with more than 256 characters, which I hope is not the case. Have
you tried changing your password etc. in this forum? It also runs 2.1.0 on
Linux.
I made a version under
http://midas/cgi-bin/cvsweb/~checkout~/elog/elogd.c?rev=2.67&content-
type=text/plain
which has improved error output for this problem, maybe this helps. |
Re: Error while trying to change password (elogd 2.1.0), posted by Stefan Siegel on Wed Aug 14 13:44:12 2002
|
> > When logging in with a username and password; then trying to logout or
> > change password one gets the following message:
> >
> > Error: Parameter value too big. Please increase VALUE_SIZE and recompile
> > elogd ; Please use your browser's back button to go back
> >
> > (up to now I have not yet tried to recompile - may be it works then)
>
> That's strange. This error should only occur if someone uses a user name or
> password with more than 256 characters, which I hope is not the case. Have
> you tried changing your password etc. in this forum? It also runs 2.1.0 on
> Linux.
>
> I made a version under
>
> http://midas/cgi-bin/cvsweb/~checkout~/elog/elogd.c?rev=2.67&content-
> type=text/plain
>
> which has improved error output for this problem, maybe this helps.
Hi,
changed the VALUE_SIZE from 256 to 512. That seems to fix the problem.
Regards,
Stefan |
self-registration, posted by tony summerfelt on Fri Aug 9 21:10:20 2002
|
i seem to be unable to find a clear explanation of how to enable self-registration in the docs.
just to be sure i grepped the doc directory, but the two references to it were in the changelog and the faq.
it could be just me but i'm not reading between the lines or connecting the various places in the docs to get it going :/ |
Re: self-registration, posted by Stefan Ritt on Sat Aug 10 13:00:26 2002
|
> i seem to be unable to find a clear explanation of how to enable self-
registration in the docs.
>
> just to be sure i grepped the doc directory, but the two references to it
were in the changelog and the faq.
>
> it could be just me but i'm not reading between the lines or connecting the
various places in the docs to get it going :/
Sorry, I haven't fully documented it yet, will do on Monday next week. For
now, see the configuration file for this forum which is attached. |
Re: self-registration, posted by tony summerfelt on Sun Aug 11 18:45:08 2002
|
> Sorry, I haven't fully documented it yet, will do on Monday next week. For
> now, see the configuration file for this forum which is attached.
that's ok. i just wanted to make sure that i hadn't missed something. i'm eventually switching over my entire dial up bbs, to my web page, with elog being the message system. self-registration was the last piece of the puzzle for me :) |
Edit an existing message overwrites attributes with preset values, posted by Stefan Siegel on Fri Aug 9 12:40:23 2002
|
Hello,
Is there a possibility to prevent elog to overwrite attribute values when
editing an old message? The old values are overwriten with the preset
options for that attribute.
But sometimes you will preserve attribute text and /or options from the old
message.
Thank you for your help. Regards,
Stefan |
Re: Edit an existing message overwrites attributes with preset values, posted by Stefan Ritt on Fri Aug 9 12:50:58 2002
|
> Is there a possibility to prevent elog to overwrite attribute values when
> editing an old message? The old values are overwriten with the preset
> options for that attribute.
> But sometimes you will preserve attribute text and /or options from the old
> message.
The option "Fixed attributes = ..." will do the job. |
Re: Edit an existing message overwrites attributes with preset values, posted by Stefan Siegel on Fri Aug 9 13:04:58 2002
|
> > Is there a possibility to prevent elog to overwrite attribute values when
> > editing an old message? The old values are overwriten with the preset
> > options for that attribute.
> > But sometimes you will preserve attribute text and /or options from the
old
> > message.
>
> The option "Fixed attributes = ..." will do the job.
Ok, but is there a possibility to preserve the fields of the old message, but
still be able to edit it. This would be a nice feature in the case of an entry
with lots of attributes (set to something different then the preset values).
After submiting the message you realize : one option was wrong and now you
want to edit it without changing the other options again.
Is this possible?
Thank you and best regards,
Stefan |
Re: Edit an existing message overwrites attributes with preset values, posted by Stefan Ritt on Fri Aug 9 14:59:17 2002
|
> Ok, but is there a possibility to preserve the fields of the old message,
but
> still be able to edit it. This would be a nice feature in the case of an
entry
> with lots of attributes (set to something different then the preset
values).
> After submiting the message you realize : one option was wrong and now you
> want to edit it without changing the other options again.
> Is this possible?
Actually this is a good idea. After thinking a while, I wonder if anybody at
all would like not to preserve the preset values. So if nobody complains, I
will set the behaviour such that elog always preserves the entries if one
edits an existing message. |
problem with required attributes, posted by Stefan Siegel on Wed Aug 7 15:43:28 2002
|
When an entry is submitted with an required attribute missing one gets to
the resubmit page. When you the click your browsers back button all
previously filled attribute field are blank.
Is there a workaround to get the old text back?
used versions:
Elog 2.0.5
Netscape 4.76
Best regards,
Stefan |
Re: problem with required attributes, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Aug 7 15:51:18 2002
|
> When an entry is submitted with an required attribute missing one gets to
> the resubmit page. When you the click your browsers back button all
> previously filled attribute field are blank.
>
> Is there a workaround to get the old text back?
>
> used versions:
> Elog 2.0.5
> Netscape 4.76
>
> Best regards,
>
> Stefan
This problem must be specific to NS 4.76, I don't have it on IE, NS 6, Mozilla
1, Opera etc. Maybe you should upgrade. Anybody else made this observation? |
Compiling elog 2.0.4 on Solaris, posted by Christian Korschan on Mon Jul 8 21:01:00 2002
|
Comiling elogd 2.0.4 under Solaris obviously fails with
gcc -o elog elog.c -lsocket -lnsl
gcc -o elogd elogd.c -lsocket -lnsl
elogd.c: In function `ss_file_find':
elogd.c:1372: `alphasort' undeclared (first use in this function)
elogd.c:1372: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
elogd.c:1372: for each function it appears in.)
make: *** [elogd] Error 1
because alphasort is an ucb'ism which does not exist under SYSV
... not very portable :-( |
Re: Compiling elog 2.0.4 on Solaris, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Jul 9 09:33:47 2002
|
> Comiling elogd 2.0.4 under Solaris obviously fails with
>
> gcc -o elog elog.c -lsocket -lnsl
> gcc -o elogd elogd.c -lsocket -lnsl
> elogd.c: In function `ss_file_find':
> elogd.c:1372: `alphasort' undeclared (first use in this function)
> elogd.c:1372: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
> elogd.c:1372: for each function it appears in.)
> make: *** [elogd] Error 1
>
> because alphasort is an ucb'ism which does not exist under SYSV
>
> ... not very portable :-(
I was not aware of this. Actually, I don't need 'alphasort' so I removed it
from the source. The update is at
http://midas.psi.ch/cgi-bin/cvsweb/elog/elogd.c
Please give it a try. |
Re: Compiling elog 2.0.4 on Solaris, posted by Christian Korschan on Wed Jul 24 17:29:00 2002
|
> > Comiling elogd 2.0.4 under Solaris obviously fails with
> >
> > gcc -o elog elog.c -lsocket -lnsl
> > gcc -o elogd elogd.c -lsocket -lnsl
> > elogd.c: In function `ss_file_find':
> > elogd.c:1372: `alphasort' undeclared (first use in this function)
> > elogd.c:1372: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
> > elogd.c:1372: for each function it appears in.)
> > make: *** [elogd] Error 1
> >
> > because alphasort is an ucb'ism which does not exist under SYSV
> >
> > ... not very portable :-(
>
> I was not aware of this. Actually, I don't need 'alphasort' so I removed it
> from the source. The update is at
>
> http://midas.psi.ch/cgi-bin/cvsweb/elog/elogd.c
>
> Please give it a try.
ok - i just continued with 2.0.5, but apparently it still has an UCB'ism
(scandir) that does not work under SYSV:
$ make
gcc -g -o elogd elogd.c -lsocket -lnsl
Undefined first referenced
symbol in file
scandir /tmp/ccy0Z3iV.o
ld: fatal: Symbol referencing errors. No output written to elogd
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make: *** [elogd] Error 1
$ egrep scandir elogd.c
n = scandir(path, &namelist, NULL, NULL);
$ |
Re: Compiling elog 2.0.4 on Solaris, posted by Joe Nall on Sat Aug 3 17:35:39 2002
|
> > > Comiling elogd 2.0.4 under Solaris obviously fails with
> > >
> > > gcc -o elog elog.c -lsocket -lnsl
> > > gcc -o elogd elogd.c -lsocket -lnsl
> > > elogd.c: In function `ss_file_find':
> > > elogd.c:1372: `alphasort' undeclared (first use in this function)
> > > elogd.c:1372: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
> > > elogd.c:1372: for each function it appears in.)
> > > make: *** [elogd] Error 1
> > >
> > > because alphasort is an ucb'ism which does not exist under SYSV
> > >
> > > ... not very portable :-(
> >
> > I was not aware of this. Actually, I don't need 'alphasort' so I removed
it
> > from the source. The update is at
> >
> > http://midas.psi.ch/cgi-bin/cvsweb/elog/elogd.c
> >
> > Please give it a try.
>
> ok - i just continued with 2.0.5, but apparently it still has an UCB'ism
> (scandir) that does not work under SYSV:
>
> $ make
> gcc -g -o elogd elogd.c -lsocket -lnsl
> Undefined first referenced
> symbol in file
> scandir /tmp/ccy0Z3iV.o
> ld: fatal: Symbol referencing errors. No output written to elogd
> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> make: *** [elogd] Error 1
> $ egrep scandir elogd.c
> n = scandir(path, &namelist, NULL, NULL);
> $
I am having the same experience with ELOG 2.0.5 and Solaris 8. Any work
around woud be appreciated. |
Re: Compiling elog 2.0.4 on Solaris, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Aug 6 16:14:42 2002
|
> > > > Comiling elogd 2.0.4 under Solaris obviously fails with
> > > >
> > > > gcc -o elog elog.c -lsocket -lnsl
> > > > gcc -o elogd elogd.c -lsocket -lnsl
> > > > elogd.c: In function `ss_file_find':
> > > > elogd.c:1372: `alphasort' undeclared (first use in this function)
> > > > elogd.c:1372: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
> > > > elogd.c:1372: for each function it appears in.)
> > > > make: *** [elogd] Error 1
> > > >
> > > > because alphasort is an ucb'ism which does not exist under SYSV
> > > >
> > > > ... not very portable :-(
> > >
> > > I was not aware of this. Actually, I don't need 'alphasort' so I
removed
> it
> > > from the source. The update is at
> > >
> > > http://midas.psi.ch/cgi-bin/cvsweb/elog/elogd.c
> > >
> > > Please give it a try.
> >
> > ok - i just continued with 2.0.5, but apparently it still has an UCB'ism
> > (scandir) that does not work under SYSV:
> >
> > $ make
> > gcc -g -o elogd elogd.c -lsocket -lnsl
> > Undefined first referenced
> > symbol in file
> > scandir /tmp/ccy0Z3iV.o
> > ld: fatal: Symbol referencing errors. No output written to elogd
> > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> > make: *** [elogd] Error 1
> > $ egrep scandir elogd.c
> > n = scandir(path, &namelist, NULL, NULL);
> > $
> I am having the same experience with ELOG 2.0.5 and Solaris 8. Any work
> around woud be appreciated.
I removed also scandir() in the current version (right now only in CVS). The
official release of 2.1.0 is planned for next week. |
New beta version of ELOG, testing required, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Aug 6 15:52:09 2002
|
Hi,
I added many features to ELOG recently, but before making a new release, I
would like some beta testing. In addition to the current modes of
operation, a logbook can be configured to require a user to be logged in to
submit new messages. If not logged it, one can only read messages. To
obtain a new account, one can do a self-registering. In this process, one
can also enter the email address which is then filled in automatically on
new logbook entries.
So please go to the forum logbook, create a new account for yourself and
try things out. If there is any problem, please let me know.
Many thanks in advance, Stefan Ritt. |
Scroll box for attributes, posted by mo on Tue Jul 30 17:33:24 2002
|
Hello,
If you have the text box turned off so you only enter attributes, is it
possible to have a couple of attributes that have small scroll through text
boxs of a couple of lines rather than just one line? Like not as big as
the regular text box but something small to be able to post a couple of
lines in and if it gets bigger then you scroll down. For instance if you
are posting a problem and a solution just have one small text box for the
problem and one for the solution.
Thanks,
Mo |
Re: Scroll box for attributes, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Jul 30 17:54:53 2002
|
> Hello,
> If you have the text box turned off so you only enter attributes, is it
> possible to have a couple of attributes that have small scroll through text
> boxs of a couple of lines rather than just one line? Like not as big as
> the regular text box but something small to be able to post a couple of
> lines in and if it gets bigger then you scroll down. For instance if you
> are posting a problem and a solution just have one small text box for the
> problem and one for the solution.
Having multi-line attributes would be pretty difficult since it would break
the way the database works (one attribute at a line). So for now, you have to
use the text box and the reply functionality to deal with problems and fixes
(like for this entry). |
elogd.cfg cannot be saved, posted by Mo on Thu Jul 25 19:17:13 2002
|
Hello,
In the newest version of eLog, I was having trouble saving the
configurations once I change them through the web interface. I can change
them and save them fine if I do it in notepad; but that way you have to
restart the elogd server. I think this is a bug on the new version unless
I am doing something wrong. Also I was wondering if you were going to add
any of the wish list items on version 2.0.6 (Conditional attributes seems
to have the most votes and would be an extremely helpful feature!! :-).
Thank You.
Mo. |
Re: elogd.cfg cannot be saved, posted by Stefan Ritt on Fri Jul 26 10:47:21 2002
|
> In the newest version of eLog, I was having trouble saving the
> configurations once I change them through the web interface.
I found a problem in the elogd.c code, which might cause that proplem
sometimes. The fix is available from
http://midas.psi.ch/cgi-bin/cvsweb/elog/elogd.c
If you need a windows executable, please let me know.
> I can change
> them and save them fine if I do it in notepad; but that way you have to
> restart the elogd server.
That should not be necessary, since elogd reads in the configuration file at
each access, so it can be modified externally without problem (although the
internal configuration should be the preferred way...)
> Also I was wondering if you were going to add
> any of the wish list items on version 2.0.6 (Conditional attributes seems
> to have the most votes and would be an extremely helpful feature!! :-).
I will have some spare time towards the end of August, so I hope to work on
these requests next month. |