Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 78 of 807  Not logged in ELOG logo
ID Date Icon Authordown Author Email Category OS ELOG Version Subject
  583   Mon Jul 12 11:03:10 2004 Agree Ulrich Trüsselulrich.truessel@familienhund.chRequestAll2.5.3Re: Formatting parameters for attributes
Thank you Stefan!

1. Will help in the real hard cases!

2. Great! Specially editing adresses or some stutus overviews will be easier with a compleate
overview!

> > 1. Is there a possiblity to fix the position of the attribut fields if they are in
> > the same line? As. ex. if one attribute is empty or contain a very short value it may
> > be possible that the position of the following atrributes in the line are moving to
> > the left, if the value is very long, they move to the right side. This make it
> > sometime not easy to read the informations, specially if the user browses trough some
> > entries, the picture the eyes are scanning is changing.
> 
> Yes there is a possibility. In the format option, you can specify two CSS names, one for the
> attribute and one for it's value. The default ones are "attribname" and "attribvalue". Just
> make new ones by copying these two, renaming it to something like xxxname and xxxvalue where
> "xxxx" is the name of the attribute. You find that in the file themes/default/default.css.
> They contain a field called "width:" which can be changed:
> 
> .typename {
>   width:150px;             <-- must be changed
>   background-color:#CCCCFF;
>   border:1px solid #0000FF;
>   border-top:1px solid white;
>   border-left:1px solid white;
>   padding:3px;
> }
> 
> By having separate classes for all attributed, you can change their width separately,
> accomplishing hopefully what you need.
> 
> > 2. Did I understand you right, that tis will not work while editing? I would like to
> > put this to the wish list for a uppcoming version (not very importand, but VERY nice
> > to have), that it may be possible to use Format in the new and edit mode too, because
> > it is somtimes more comfortable to have some attributes grouped locically in one line
> > or to have a overview over all attributes on one screen without scrolling while editing.
> 
> I will put this on the wishlist.
> 
> Stefan
  618   Tue Jul 27 17:56:56 2004 Warning Ulrich Trüsselulrich.truessel@familienhund.chBug reportWindows2.5.3 snapList Dispaly produces wrong output in 2.5.3 built 23.7.04 (snapshot)
I did not have the following problem in any snapshot before 23.7.04 .
Actually I do not have a possibility to test the snapshot under an other
system than win xp pro sp 1 (fully pached). 

Using my logbooks as well as the demo logbook works well under older
snapsgots of 2.5.3 as well as long as the "List Display = <attributes>" is
not used!

Using "List Display = <attributes>" produces an ususal output with the text
field content in the first row and a row title of the first 3 letters.

Ex.:
Attributes = Customername, Customeraddres
List Display = Customername, Customeraddres

Output:
¦Cus¦Customeraddres¦

If no record is in the logbook, only the "Cus" is dispalyed! Removing "List
Display = <attributes>" produces a normal output with same logbook!

By the way: Thnak's for the Format in the entry/edit view!!!
  623   Wed Jul 28 16:13:04 2004 Agree Ulrich Trüsselulrich.truessel@familienhund.chBug reportWindows2.5.3 snapRe: List Dispaly produces wrong output in 2.5.3 built 23.7.04 (snapshot)
Thank you very much Stefan!!!

Also the horizontal alignement with "Format = 1" looks much better   as before
with standard css files! Really great work!

> > Using "List Display = <attributes>" produces an ususal output with the text
> > field content in the first row and a row title of the first 3 letters.
> 
> I fixed that problem. Please get the snapshot from July 28th 14:16.
  764   Fri Nov 5 16:59:30 2004 Question Ulrich Trüsselulrich.truessel@familienhund.chBug reportWindows2.5.5$message id gives wrong value - Gernman traslalation of Back
1.

I do not know if this is a problen of the 2.5.5 (11/03/04) version or of
other versions as well:

I'm using the $message id parameter in a substitution:
Subst KlientIn/KundIn = $Vorname $Name; P: $Telefon Privat; G: $Telefon
Geschäft; N: $Telefon Mobil; $Landeskennung-$PLZ $Ortschaft [<a
href="http://localhost:8080/$logbook/$message id">$logbook:$mesage id</a>]

the "$message id" will not be replaced by the msg id, the string "$message
id"  will be dispalyed and used. Other substitutions as $logbook etc. are
working.

Is this a bug or did i missunderstood the manual?


2.

Since Version 2.5.5: If ELOG is running under German, the "Zurück" Bottom is
named "Back". Any Idee where I can change this back?  ;-)

2.5.4-6 was corretly translated.
  766   Fri Nov 5 21:37:56 2004 Reply Ulrich Trüsselulrich.truessel@familienhund.chBug reportWindows2.5.5Re: $message id gives wrong value - Gernman traslalation of Back
1. thats now clear with the £message id and the work-around is ok for my 
needs

2. the "bacl" link is clear and tranlated to "Liste". But I mean the back 
button 
in the entry and the edit mode (see picture)...  ;-)

> > the "$message id" will not be replaced by the msg id, the 
string "$message
> > id"  will be dispalyed and used. Other substitutions as $logbook etc. 
are
> > working.
> > 
> > Is this a bug or did i missunderstood the manual?
> 
> Well, the manual does not state that "$message id" should work for "Subst
> <attribute>" option (;-)
> 
> The reason is that the message ID is available only *after* a new entry 
has been
> written to the database, and the "Subst" command is evaluated *before* 
an entry
> is submitted. "$message id" only works for "Thread display", "RSS 
Title", "Subst
> on reply", "Subst on edit" and "Display". You should use
> 
> Display KlientIn/KundIn = $Vorname $Name; P: $Telefon Privat; G: $Telefon
> Geschaft; N: $Telefon Mobil; $Landeskennung-$PLZ $Ortschaft [<a
> href="http://localhost:8080/$logbook/$message id">$logbook:$message 
id</a>]
> 
> Please note that you wrote "mesage id", correct is however "message id" 
(two
> "s"), so there is also a typo.
> 
> > Since Version 2.5.5: If ELOG is running under German, the "Zurück" 
Bottom is
> > named "Back". Any Idee where I can change this back?  ;-)
> 
> The link "Back" has been replaced upon request by "List" which is more
> appropriate. So if you changed your menu with "Menu commands = ...", 
please
> replace "Back" by "List" there.
Attachment 1: Screen 255 Back.jpg
Screen 255 Back.jpg
  768   Sun Nov 7 09:49:13 2004 Smile Ulrich Trüsselulrich.truessel@familienhund.chBug reportWindows2.5.5Re: $message id gives wrong value - Gernman traslalation of Back
installed elog 2.5.5 agin, same effekt with "back" / "zurück". checked the 
language file eloglang.german witch seem ok for me and the translations are 
well done. removed then in eloglang.germen the traslation for back and checked 
this: still back was viewed. reinserted the translation "Zurück" (just this 
word!)and checked again: everithing looks fine, no longer back, correctly 
Zurück on the button.
absolutly no idea why and whats the difference was! bus it works...
thank's stefan!  :-)

> > 2. the "back" link is clear and tranlated to "Liste". But I mean the back 
> > button 
> > in the entry and the edit mode (see picture)...  ;-)
> 
> Well, if you try with the demo logbook, the "Back" button is translated
> correctly, so I don't know whats wong in your case. Can you check that your
> eloglang.german file is intact?
  821   Fri Dec 3 08:43:49 2004 Angy Ulrich Trüsselulrich.truessel@familienhund.chBug reportWindows2.5.5-1ELOG-Server crashes after date entry
God really STRANGE and problematic effect on 2.5.5-1 (can't remember it this
was with 2.5.5 or 2.5.4-X but i'm nearly sure it worked well):

Entering a date (Formate Bithday = date) may crash down the server:
Value is 22.2.2004: Everything is well
Value is 22.2.1962: Server crashes emmediatly (menas restarzing several
times, always the same problem)

I do not have time to check true all the years for finding out where the
problem may beginn, sorry. Also I was not able to check on other systems
right now. My system: Win XP Pro SP 1, IE 6 as well as Mozilla Calssic 1.7.3. 

Didn't check it under Linux right know in case of a lot work.

Clould you this fix please Stefan???  THANK'X!!!
  856   Sun Dec 19 19:00:06 2004 Question Ulrich Trüsselulrich.truessel@familienhund.chBug reportWindows2.5.5-2Re: Redirect to wrong hostname
know that illness...  :-(  but was the last of the family of 4 people

i'd like to ask for an other usefull change togehter with this and how url's are 
handled by elog:

since there may be spaces in the name of a logbook (ex. "1stWordOfLogbook 
2ndWordOfLogbook") it is very userfriendly to name logbooks. also it's easy th 
make a reference for a other entry by copy and paste:

Display ThisURL = http://localhost:8080/$logbook/$message id

however, using spaces in the logbook name may give a wrong result, because the 
url would be http://localhost:8080/1stWordOfLogbook

and the space as well as the 2ndWordOfLogbook//$message id is only normal text.

may it be possible stefan, to replace the space in an url (starting 
with "http://") with a "+" or "%20"? this would allow to automate some things. 
actual the logbook name has to be hardcoded.


> > I think you should be using tcp_hostname instead of gethostname if it is 
> > specified.
> 
> Sorry my late reply, I was ill for some time. I implemented your suggestion in
> revision 1.522 which is available from CVS.
> 
> Note that there is also the "URL = xxx" option in the configuration file which
> lets you specify the whole URL including the host name.
ELOG V3.1.5-3fb85fa6