Rename Logbook, posted by mike cianci on Sun Sep 4 23:01:15 2011
|
I have a logbook with data in it that I need to rename and preserve the the existing data (old book) in the newly named book
(i.e. can I move all of the data from one book to a new book and than delete the data from the original book)?
As always thank you for your time. |
Re: Rename Logbook, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon Sep 5 17:10:19 2011
|
mike cianci wrote:
I have a logbook with data in it that I need to rename and preserve the the existing |
|
Re: Rename Logbook, posted by mike cianci on Fri Sep 23 01:16:30 2011
|
Stefan Ritt wrote:
|
|
Re: Rename Logbook, posted by David Pilgram on Fri Sep 23 10:46:58 2011
|
mike cianci wrote:
|
|
Re: Rename Logbook, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon Sep 26 11:34:36 2011
|
David Pilgram wrote:
Anyway, Stefan <i>et al</i> have got CERN's faster-than-light particle problem to deal with |
|
Re: Rename Logbook, posted by mike cianci on Fri Sep 30 22:38:43 2011
|
Stefan Ritt wrote:
|
|
Re: Rename Logbook, posted by David Pilgram on Fri Sep 30 22:55:01 2011
|
mike cianci wrote:
|
|
Digest page or email?, posted by Graham Medlin on Wed Sep 28 22:10:30 2011
|
We have about 10 logbooks running on the same Elog that all get fair use. Many people have turned off new entry emails because they
were filling up inboxes, but are still interested in what's new. I saw the option to add "?last=1" to the start page, although
I'm afraid using it might cause confusion over how to get to the older posts. |
Re: Digest page or email?, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Sep 29 10:12:40 2011 
|
Graham Medlin wrote:
We have about 10 logbooks running on the same Elog that all get fair use. Many people have turned |
|
Re: Digest page or email?, posted by Graham Medlin on Thu Sep 29 16:55:25 2011
|
Stefan Ritt wrote:
|
Memory Leak in V2.9.0-2411 (Mirroring Related), posted by Ryan on Tue Sep 20 04:46:55 2011
|
I have two identical servers (IBM X337) setup on the same LAN with Ubuntu Linux 10.04 LTS with ELOGD running (Compiled from tarbell) with the same exact
package install base. (Only difference between the two servers is the hostname, and the ELOGD.CFG global section)
I noticed after setting these servers up today that ELOGD crashed on the server configured to mirror. It looks like |
|
Elog crashes with URL find npp=0, posted by Andreas Luedeke on Tue Sep 13 11:54:16 2011
|
Some user wanted to modify the URL by hand and succeeded to crash the elogd process with npp=now
It appears that npp=0 crashes elogd with the following error message:
|
Re: Elog crashes with URL find npp=0, posted by Andreas Luedeke on Tue Sep 13 13:38:19 2011
|
> [...] It appears that npp=0 crashes elogd [...]
Here's a patch: search for "npp" in src/elogd.c and add the following line:
|
Expiration of ELOG forum accounts, posted by Stefan Ritt on Fri Sep 9 12:54:13 2011
|
Dear ELOG users,
the ELOG discussion forum at PSI contains in meantime many old accounts with non-functional
email addresses. Since this causes some overhead, it has been decided to clean up the current account database. In order to keep your account alive, please |
|
Password may not contain blanks, posted by Terry Shuck on Tue Aug 30 20:58:18 2011
|
After setting up email addresses for notifications I noticed that the "Full Name" has part of an email address in it. I've tried several ways
to correct this however it keeps sending me to a page that says "Password may not contain blanks" and I've not done anything with the password.
Can you tell me how to correct this issue? |
|
Re: Password may not contain blanks, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Aug 31 15:21:03 2011
|
Terry Shuck wrote:
After setting up email addresses for notifications I noticed that the "Full Name" has part |
|
Re: Password may not contain blanks, posted by Terry Shuck on Wed Aug 31 16:21:23 2011
|
Stefan Ritt wrote:
|
|
Re: Password may not contain blanks, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Aug 31 16:33:39 2011
|
Terry Shuck wrote:
|
|
Re: Password may not contain blanks, posted by Terry Shuck on Wed Aug 31 17:02:40 2011
|
Stefan Ritt wrote:
|
|
Re: Password may not contain blanks, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Sep 7 12:17:44 2011
|
Terry Shuck wrote:
Anyway if I have to wipe out ELOG and start over to have admin capabilities again, do all of my logbooks |
|
Re: Password may not contain blanks, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Sep 7 12:37:38 2011
|
Terry Shuck wrote:
Can you tell me how to stop elogd? I've edited that file several times however when I open ELOG in my |
|
Re: Password may not contain blanks, posted by Andreas Luedeke on Tue Sep 6 12:15:54 2011
|
Stefan Ritt wrote:
|
Re: Password may not contain blanks, posted by Terry Shuck on Wed Sep 7 16:23:01 2011
|
Andreas Luedeke wrote:
|
|
Attachments (again), posted by David Pilgram on Wed Aug 31 14:00:17 2011
|
OK, so no-one has ideas as per my question in elog:67088.
Looking at the issue from another angle.
|
|
Re: Attachments (again), posted by Andreas Luedeke on Wed Aug 31 15:00:11 2011
|
> In my case the original .pdf file is elsewhere, I've no need to have duplicates scatted in various logbooks, and
> while ideally
that would also be true of the thumbnail, it is fair enough for this to be stored in each logbook
> where it is required. This removes
the issue of how to have an attachment in a different logbook (other than by
> links, which would get rather tiresome to have to keep making).
>
> |
|
Re: Attachments (again), posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Aug 31 15:13:02 2011
|
Andreas Luedeke wrote:
> In my case the original .pdf file is elsewhere, I've no need to have duplicates scatted in various |
|
Re: Attachments (again), posted by David Pilgram on Wed Aug 31 15:29:32 2011
|
Hi Stefan,
>Sure, but that works only from a hidden logbook into a public one, not the other way, but I think this is what
|
|
Re: Attachments (again), posted by David Pilgram on Wed Aug 31 15:20:48 2011
|
Hi Andreas,
>Of course the attachment has to be in the public logbook and the link in the hidden one.
|
|
Re: Attachments (again), posted by Andreas Luedeke on Tue Sep 6 12:00:13 2011
|
> I wondered if there had been some flag for the config file whereby the original file for attachment was
> processed by ImageMagick, but not stored, only the .png file(s) stored - or rather, some other way that achieved
> the same end. as there is no such flag at present.
|
|
Re: Attachments (again), posted by David Pilgram on Tue Sep 6 12:39:39 2011
|
> > I wondered if there had been some flag for the config file whereby the original file for attachment was
> > processed by ImageMagick, but not stored, only the .png file(s) stored - or rather, some other way that achieved
> > the same end. as there is no such flag at present.
|
|
SEGV after upgrade from 2.7.8 to 2.9.0, posted by Kester Habermann on Mon Aug 15 11:36:02 2011
|
Hello,
We've been using ELOG 2.6.5 to 2.7.8 for 4 years without any major problems.
Recently we upgraded to version 2.9.0 and since we've had the daemon frequently crash with SEGV. |