Partial Bulgarian translation, posted by Ognyan Kulev on Sat Nov 20 19:44:57 2004
|
Hi, we are using ELOG for keeping track of a server maintainance. I've
translated some of ELOG's strings. The file is attached. There will be
more translations, when I get inspired again ;-) |
elog password access without users, posted by damon nettles on Tue Nov 16 17:49:54 2004
|
is there a way to set up a logbook so that a password is required to get
into it, but no username? |
Re: elog password access without users, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Nov 16 18:07:31 2004
|
> i |
Re: elog password access without users, posted by damon nettles on Tue Nov 16 22:06:29 2004
|
> > is there a way to set up a logbook so that a password is required to get
> > into it, but no username?
>
|
Re: elog password access without users, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Nov 16 22:45:24 2004
|
> thanks. that seems to get me the functionality i needed. is there any way to
> get rid of the username line when using the "Read Password" feature?
|
elog password access without users, posted by damon nettles on Tue Nov 16 17:49:54 2004
|
is there a way to set up a logbook so that a password is required to get
into it, but no username? |
Re: elog password access without users, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Nov 16 18:07:31 2004
|
> i |
Re: elog password access without users, posted by damon nettles on Tue Nov 16 22:06:29 2004
|
> > is there a way to set up a logbook so that a password is required to get
> > into it, but no username?
>
|
Re: elog password access without users, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Nov 16 22:45:24 2004
|
> thanks. that seems to get me the functionality i needed. is there any way to
> get rid of the username line when using the "Read Password" feature?
|
stunnel problems with new version, posted by damon nettles on Mon Nov 15 20:50:01 2004
|
i am trying to implement ssl features on our logbooks. however, it seems
that stunnel has drastically changed their program and the usual startup
procedures listed on the elog page don't work.
|
Re: stunnel problems with new version, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon Nov 15 21:25:34 2004
|
> i am trying to implement ssl features on our logbooks. however, it seems
> that stunnel has drastically changed their program and the usual startup
> procedures listed on the elog page don't work.
|
Re: stunnel problems with new version, posted by damon nettles on Mon Nov 15 21:59:56 2004
|
> > i am trying to implement ssl features on our logbooks. however, it seems
> > that stunnel has drastically changed their program and the usual startup
> > procedures listed on the elog page don't work.
|
$message id gives wrong value - Gernman traslalation of Back, posted by Ulrich Trüssel on Fri Nov 5 16:59:30 2004
|
1.
I do not know if this is a problen of the 2.5.5 (11/03/04) version or of
|
Re: $message id gives wrong value - Gernman traslalation of Back, posted by Stefan Ritt on Fri Nov 5 17:45:47 2004
|
> the "$message id" will not be replaced by the msg id, the string "$message
> id" will be dispalyed and used. Other substitutions as $logbook etc. are
> working.
|
Re: $message id gives wrong value - Gernman traslalation of Back, posted by Ulrich Trüssel on Fri Nov 5 21:37:56 2004
|
1. thats now clear with the £message id and the work-around is ok for my
needs
|
Re: $message id gives wrong value - Gernman traslalation of Back, posted by Stefan Ritt on Sat Nov 6 11:29:52 2004
|
> 2. the "bacl" link is clear and tranlated to "Liste". But I mean the back
> button
> in the entry and the edit mode (see picture)... ;-)
|
Re: $message id gives wrong value - Gernman traslalation of Back, posted by Ulrich Trüssel on Sun Nov 7 09:49:13 2004
|
installed elog 2.5.5 agin, same effekt with "back" / "zurück". checked the
language file eloglang.german witch seem ok for me and the translations are
well done. removed then in eloglang.germen the traslation for back and checked
|
Can the elog client submit an entry with a html body?, posted by Kristinn B. Gylfason on Tue Nov 2 02:51:09 2004
|
I'm running a Debian package of elog with verision number 2.5.4+r1480-1.
The revision of the elog client in this package is 1.21.
|
Re: Can the elog client submit an entry with a html body?, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Nov 2 17:47:43 2004
|
> Is it possible to submit an entry with a html body using the elog client?
I added a "-H" flag for that. New version of elog.c under CVS and in the next
|
Re: Can the elog client submit an entry with a html body?, posted by Kristinn B. Gylfason on Tue Nov 2 18:15:09 2004
|
> > Is it possible to submit an entry with a html body using the elog client?
>
> I added a "-H" flag for that. New version of elog.c under CVS and in the next
|
, posted by on Thu Aug 19 16:20:16 2004
|
Here are some things for your wish list:
1) elogd should report quota or disk-full problem: In case a logbook
|
, posted by on Fri Oct 29 20:14:17 2004
|
> 1) elogd should report quota or disk-full problem: In case a logbook
> entry cannot be saved (quota or disk full) then a message like
> 'Could not save last entry. Please contact administrator.' should
|
Re: some things for your wishlist, posted by Heiko Scheit on Sun Oct 31 20:09:31 2004
|
> > - Use "and" and "or" operands in queries
>
> Elog supports now regular expressions. So for a "<str1> OR <str2>" one can write
|
Re: , posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon Nov 1 13:49:12 2004
|
> 2) default page view per user, i.e. the 'Back' link goes to
> ?mode=Full,summary,... depending on the user that is logged in.
> Some users complained that 'Back' is not really back. Maybe
|
Compile of Elog , posted by Martin R. Picchio on Mon Nov 1 03:08:34 2004
|
If I make changes to the elog source, How do I re-compile it and not
distrupt the program?????? |
Re: Compile of Elog , posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon Nov 1 13:45:47 2004
|
> If I make changes to the elog source, How do I re-compile it and not
> distrupt the program??????
|