User Profile - Access to logbook group, posted by Tomas Rudolf on Fri May 2 00:34:26 2003
|
Hi,
I was wondering if anyone had a solution for my problem.
|
Re: User Profile - Access to logbook group, posted by Stefan Ritt on Fri May 2 08:45:38 2003
|
> We would like to give access to selected users to only their Group. So that
> for instance Users1 cannot access the books of group Users3. I was
> wondering if there is any notion of "User profile" or security per logbook
|
|
Re: User Profile - Access to logbook group, posted by Robert Keeney on Fri May 2 15:58:23 2003
|
I have managed to get this to work (so far).
What I do is use a separate password file and directory for each log.
|
|
Re: User Profile - Access to logbook group, posted by Tomas Rudolf on Fri May 2 18:10:36 2003
|
Robert, this is exactly what we managed to do as well. And it works fine.
The only issue is that the users from one group can "SEE" the book names
available to other groups.
|
Cookie problem using Apache 1.3.23 as Proxy, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu May 1 10:27:17 2003
|
Today I found out that Apache 1.3.23 (and probably 1.3.24) has a problem
with ELOG if used as a proxy server. Due to a bug in Apache, only one
cookie is transmitted through the proxy at a time. This makes it impossible
|
|
problem with 20+ attachments, posted by Alexander ZVYAGIN on Tue Apr 22 17:17:36 2003
|
It seems that maximal number of attachments is about 20. When you try to add
more, a new entry _is_ added to the logbook but the refernce to it is not
added to the web page. |
|
Re: problem with 20+ attachments, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Apr 22 17:21:36 2003
|
> It seems that maximal number of attachments is about 20. When you try to add
> more, a new entry _is_ added to the logbook but the refernce to it is not
> added to the web page.
|
|
Re: problem with 20+ attachments, posted by Alexander ZVYAGIN on Tue Apr 22 17:34:52 2003
|
> > It seems that maximal number of attachments is about 20. When you try to add
> > more, a new entry _is_ added to the logbook but the refernce to it is not
> > added to the web page.
|
|
Re: problem with 20+ attachments, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Apr 22 20:24:03 2003
|
> Actually my report was NOT about this limitation. You have it - it is fine.
> The problem is that I add some 'zombies' or dead files to my logbook.
>
|
|
Re: problem with 20+ attachments, posted by Justin Dieters on Tue Apr 22 22:23:27 2003
|
I've been using elog for several months now, and one thing that's always
seemed odd to me are the things like max number of attachments and max
attachment size are defined right in the source code, and not in the config
|
|
Re: problem with 20+ attachments, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Apr 23 08:46:14 2003
|
> I've been using elog for several months now, and one thing that's always
> seemed odd to me are the things like max number of attachments and max
> attachment size are defined right in the source code, and not in the config
|
|
Several Problems with 2.3.5, posted by Thomas Salein on Tue Apr 22 11:18:00 2003
|
We use ELOG 2.3.5 for Windows with a German language file and have found
|
|
Re: Several Problems with 2.3.5, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Apr 22 20:17:34 2003
|
> We use ELOG 2.3.5 for Windows with a German language file and have found
> some new problems:
>
|
Converting logs, posted by Kutlay Topatan on Fri Apr 18 21:32:59 2003
|
I would like to dump mylog files into comma/tab seperated files. Is there
an easy way to do it?
|
|
Re: Converting logs, posted by Marcus Meyer on Tue Apr 22 19:27:28 2003
|
> I would like to dump mylog files into comma/tab seperated files. Is there
> an easy way to do it?
>
|
|
Re: Converting logs, posted by Recai Oktas on Tue Apr 22 19:58:13 2003
|
> Here is the error:
>
> Cannot find any ??????.log file in this directory.
|
|
Re: Converting logs, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Apr 22 20:06:51 2003
|
> `elconv' is just a simple tool to convert pre 2.0 log files to the current
> format. (Well, after all these confusions, dropping it from the future
> releases won't be surprising -at least for me- ;) You might try some
|
'Reply' removes attachments from the original message, posted by Alexander ZVYAGIN on Tue Apr 22 17:13:08 2003
|
It seems when I use "reply" with an attachments, the original attachments of
the message are removed.
|
|
Re: 'Reply' removes attachments from the original message, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Apr 22 17:16:31 2003
|
> It seems when I use "reply" with an attachments, the original attachments of
> the message are removed.
>
|
|
Re: 'Reply' removes attachments from the original message, posted by Alexander ZVYAGIN on Tue Apr 22 17:20:19 2003
|
> > It seems when I use "reply" with an attachments, the original attachments of
> > the message are removed.
> >
|
|
Opera and IE behave different, posted by Thomas Salein on Tue Apr 22 11:29:44 2003
|
I repeat ...
. Opera browser 7.03 simply crashes, when choosing the direct URL to our
logbook, i.e. http://localhost:8080/logbook2. We have set a general
|
|
Question, posted by nickc1 on Mon Apr 14 15:07:02 2003
|
Is there a way to hide logbooks from all views.
Basically i want to use the move function to move old entries to another
|
|
Re: Question, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon Apr 14 16:28:57 2003
|
> Is there a way to hide logbooks from all views.
>
> Basically i want to use the move function to move old entries to another
|
|
Re: Question, posted by nickc1 on Tue Apr 15 12:17:12 2003
|
> > Is there a way to hide logbooks from all views.
> >
> > Basically i want to use the move function to move old entries to another
|
|
Re: Question, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Apr 15 13:00:40 2003
|
> I tried that but on the summary screen it displays a list of all the
logbook
> regardless of group, also im not using public groups im using a seperate
|
|
Re: Question, posted by nickc1 on Wed Apr 16 13:28:38 2003
|
> > I tried that but on the summary screen it displays a list of all the
> logbook
> > regardless of group, also im not using public groups im using a seperate
|
|
Re: Question, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Apr 17 09:29:14 2003
|
> Yes thats wicked perfect, now im prob being thick but is there a way to
hide
> logbook tabs in the same way, as i dont really want to use groups as the
|
|
Re: Question, posted by nickc1 on Sat Apr 19 11:09:33 2003
|
> > Yes thats wicked perfect, now im prob being thick but is there a way to
> hide
> > logbook tabs in the same way, as i dont really want to use groups as the
|