Tue Apr 21 12:52:18 2015, Stefan Ritt, DRS4 Evaluation Board Baseline/Voltage Calibration
|
1) I tried to cablirate a V5 board with drsosc 5.0.3 and it just worked fine for me. No idea what went wrong in your case.
2) The "found 4096 stuck pixels on this board" can be safely ignored. It comes from the fact that the standard evaluation board has
four cannels unconnected (the DRS4 chip has 8 channels, four are connected to in the evaluation board and four are unconnected). So the software sees |
Tue Apr 21 13:03:38 2015, Daniel Stricker-Shaver, DRS4 Evaluation Board Baseline/Voltage Calibration
|
I also use Ubuntu 14.04 LTS and for my V3 borad I have to use drsosc 4.x or ealier to perform the calibration.
Stefan
Ritt wrote:
1) I tried to cablirate a V5 board with drsosc 5.0.3 and it just worked |
Tue Apr 21 13:06:39 2015, Stefan Ritt, DRS4 Evaluation Board Baseline/Voltage Calibration
|
Sure, for a V3 board you need a pre-V5 software, but I assumed Julien had a V5 board.
Daniel
Stricker-Shaver wrote:
I also use Ubuntu 14.04 LTS and for my V3 borad I have to |
Thu Apr 10 14:45:12 2014, Roman Gredig, DRS4 Evalboard V5 with Windows7Pro64bit
|
Dear Stefan
|
Wed Apr 16 10:24:55 2014, Stefan Ritt, DRS4 Evalboard V5 with Windows7Pro64bit
|
>
> Dear Stefan
>
|
Tue Feb 27 16:34:26 2018, Steven Block, DRS4 Dead times 6x
|
Hello All,
I am currently trying to figure out how to properly characterize the dead time of the DRS4 board. My most recent experiment to try and answer
this question involved using an external trigger that can range from 1Hz to 2MHz. I fed this trigger into the DRS4 and collected 1000 samples with no input |
Tue Feb 27 17:04:12 2018, Stefan Ritt, DRS4 Dead times
|
XML is very slow to write, and you are probably limited by that. Switch to binary mode, which is much faster. You will see in the end a maximum rate
of ~500 Hz, and thus a dead time of 2ms, independent of the sampling speed. Note that you have only an evaluation board, which is optimized for ease of
use. If you develop your own electronics, and do optimized readout, you can bring the deadtime down to 30ns x number of samples + 2us, or 32us if you read |
Tue Feb 27 18:04:18 2018, Steven Block, DRS4 Dead times
|
That is extremely helpful! Many thanks. One more question; If I were to take inputs from 2 channels at once, would that scale the dead time to 64us
using your example?
Steven |
Tue Feb 27 18:12:32 2018, Stefan Ritt, DRS4 Dead times
|
For applications which are critical on the dead time, one typically uses one ADC per DRS4 channel, and thus the dead time stays at 32us. If you multiplex
two DRS4 channels into one ADC channel, then it goes to 32us.
Stefan |
Thu Jan 26 09:12:03 2012, Ravindra Raghunath Shinde, DRS4 Rev2.0 for analog pulse counting
|
Hello,
We are using DRS4 Rev.2.0 board.
We want to measure number of pulses generated by charge particle detector. These negative going analog pulses are very fast having rise time |
Thu Jan 26 09:15:42 2012, Stefan Ritt, DRS4 Rev2.0 for analog pulse counting
|
Ravindra Raghunath Shinde wrote:
Hello, |
Thu Jan 26 09:44:34 2012, Ravindra Raghunath Shinde, DRS4 Rev2.0 for analog pulse counting
|
Stefan Ritt wrote:
|
Thu Jan 26 09:49:38 2012, Stefan Ritt, DRS4 Rev2.0 for analog pulse counting
|
Ravindra Raghunath Shinde wrote:
|
Thu Jan 26 10:05:57 2012, Ravindra Raghunath Shinde, DRS4 Rev2.0 for analog pulse counting
|
Stefan Ritt wrote:
|
Fri Aug 7 18:41:37 2015, dante, DRS4
|
Hi
I have just installed DRS4, but when I try to view it from the USB it don't work. Why?
|
Fri Aug 7 20:32:15 2015, Felix Bachmair, DRS4
|
Hi
Did you copy the udev rule 41-drs.rules into /etc/udev/rules.d/ ?
Which operating system are you using? |
Tue Aug 27 08:33:22 2019, chinmay basu, DRS4
|
Is DRS4 suitable for use with Silicon surface barrier detectors? |
Tue Aug 27 09:14:03 2019, Stefan Ritt, DRS4
|
Is a 5 GSPS oscilloscope suitable for use with Silicon surface barier detectors?
chinmay
basu wrote:
Is DRS4 suitable for use with Silicon surface barrier detectors? |
Tue Aug 28 17:52:45 2012, Zach Miller, DRS-4.0.0 DOScreen.cpp
|
Hi,
I found an old thread regarding a fix for DOScreen.cpp for DRS-3.1.0, that fixes an "ambiguous overload problem." Currently when I attempt
to build the drs-4.0.0, I get this similar error: |
Wed Aug 29 10:52:44 2012, Stefan Ritt, DRS-4.0.0 DOScreen.cpp
|
Zach Miller wrote:
Hi, |