 Fri Sep 12 14:57:22 2014, Dmitry Hits, compilation error for v5.0.2
|
Hi,
I am getting the following compilation error when trying to compile version 5.0.2 software:
src/DOFrame.cpp:617:14: error: invalid conversion from ‘char*’ to ‘wxChar {aka wchar_t}’ [-fpermissive]
I |
 Fri Sep 12 16:08:49 2014, Stefan Ritt, compilation error for v5.0.2
|
Dmitry Hits wrote:
Hi, |
|
Fri Sep 12 16:38:24 2014, Dmitry Hits, compilation error for v5.0.2
|
Stefan Ritt wrote:
|
|
Mon Sep 22 14:52:21 2014, Stefan Ritt, compilation error for v5.0.2
|
Dmitry Hits wrote:
|
|
Fri Sep 12 11:52:21 2014, Dmitry Hits, synchronizing two DRS4 evaluation boards readout with one computer
|
Hi everyone,
Has anyone tried to synchronize 2 (two) DRS4 evaluation boards readout by the same computer? I have read about some attempts on this board in the
past, but I do not know if they have succeeded. If yes, could you share your experience and/or software. |
|
Fri Sep 12 13:00:04 2014, Stefan Ritt, synchronizing two DRS4 evaluation boards readout with one computer
|
Dmitry Hits wrote:
Hi everyone, |
|
Fri Sep 12 13:37:42 2014, Dmitry Hits, synchronizing two DRS4 evaluation boards readout with one computer
|
Stefan Ritt wrote:
|
|
Fri Sep 12 13:41:43 2014, Stefan Ritt, synchronizing two DRS4 evaluation boards readout with one computer
|
Dmitry Hits wrote:
|
|
Thu Aug 21 11:03:36 2014, Martin Petriska, 10GSps on DRS4 Evm with delay cables
|
Hi, I read its possible to use channels 2,4,6 to extend 200ns to 400ns (1024bins to 2048).
Is it possible to use same channels to double sampling rate with paralel feeding, one channel delayed by Ts/2, for 5,12GS/s is it cca 3cm delay
cable? |
|
Tue Aug 26 12:32:21 2014, Stefan Ritt, 10GSps on DRS4 Evm with delay cables
|
Martin Petriska wrote:
Hi, I read its possible to use channels 2,4,6 to extend 200ns to 400ns (1024bins to 2048). |
|
Tue May 13 19:34:58 2014, Luka Pavelic, drsosc binary to cern ROOT file conversion
|
Hi,
Does anybody have program for conversion from binary or xml to cern ROOT *.root file? |
|
Tue May 13 19:39:36 2014, Stefan Ritt, drsosc binary to cern ROOT file conversion
|
Luka Pavelic wrote:
Hi, |
|
Tue May 13 22:03:47 2014, Luka Pavelic, drsosc binary to cern ROOT file conversion
|
Thank you for your fast and very helpful replay.
I made it work with drsosc version 4 but with version 5 i am getting weird results. Is it possible that they changed binary formatting? |
|
Tue May 13 23:08:50 2014, Stefan Ritt, drsosc binary to cern ROOT file conversion
|
Luka Pavelic wrote:
Thank you for your fast and very helpful replay. |
|
Fri Jun 27 11:23:19 2014, ChengMing Du, drsosc binary to cern ROOT file conversion
|
Stefan Ritt wrote:
|
|
Wed Jul 30 17:05:38 2014, Stefan Ritt, drsosc binary to cern ROOT file conversion
|
ChengMing Du wrote:
|
Tue Jun 18 14:19:39 2013, Stefan Ritt, ROOT program to decode binary data from DRSOsc 
|
Please find attached a simple ROOT based program (http://root.cern.ch) to decode binary data from the DRSOsc program. It assumes that all four channels
were recorded. If this is not the case, the program can be adjusted accordingly.
To use it, simply type (assuming that you have written a data file "test.dat" with DRSOsc): |
|
Wed Jul 30 17:05:06 2014, Stefan Ritt, ROOT program to decode binary data from DRSOsc
|
Stefan Ritt wrote:
Please find attached a simple ROOT based program (http://root.cern.ch) to decode binary data from the |
|
Wed Jul 30 11:38:58 2014, Tsutomu Nagayoshi, Sampling speed of DRS4 Board ver4
|
Hello!
I have a question concerning the sampling speed of the DRS4 evaluation board.
It is written in the manual that the sampling speed of DRS4 Evaluation Board is supported above 0.7 GHz. |
|
Mon Jul 14 19:03:05 2014, Yves Bianga, change cascading from 1024 to 2048 bins for each input channel
|
Hello,
I want to ask whether it is possible to modify a Evaluation Board 5.0 from 1024 to 2048 cells for each of the 4 input channels.
On
the rev50 manual at page 31 I found an option to connect the 4 unused channels by setting 8 solder bridges.
The source code for controlling |
|
Wed Jul 16 12:10:19 2014, Stefan Ritt, change cascading from 1024 to 2048 bins for each input channel
|
Yves Bianga wrote:
Hello, |
|
Wed Jan 15 14:20:51 2014, Stefan Ritt, Announcement of new Evaluation Board V5
|
Dear DRS community,
starting from this year, we ship the new evaluation board V5. This board has an improved internal timing calibration, with which one can measure
the time with a precision down to a few ps. Following picture shows the time between two pulses, obtained with a function generator, a passive split and |
|
Tue Feb 18 14:12:37 2014, Stefan Ritt, Announcement of new Evaluation Board V5
|
Stefan Ritt wrote:
Dear DRS community, |
|
Mon Jun 9 12:03:26 2014, Osip Lishilin, Announcement of new Evaluation Board V5
|
Stefan Ritt wrote:
Hardware scalers for all four channels and the trigger working up to 200 MHz. With the trigger scaler |
|
Wed Jun 11 11:13:50 2014, Stefan Ritt, Announcement of new Evaluation Board V5
|
Osip Lishilin wrote:
|
|
Mon Jun 16 15:35:59 2014, Osip Lishilin, Announcement of new Evaluation Board V5
|
Stefan Ritt wrote:
|
|
Thu May 29 04:22:43 2014, Toshihiro Nonaka, CalibrationWaveform
|
I'm writing the drs_exam.cpp to use multi-boards(v3, firmware:4.0.0), and taking data succeeded. But I have several questions about function written
in DRS.cpp.
|
|
Thu Jun 12 17:16:13 2014, Stefan Ritt, CalibrationWaveform
|
Toshihiro Nonaka wrote:
I'm writing the drs_exam.cpp to use multi-boards(v3, firmware:4.0.0), and taking data succeeded. But |
|
Thu Jun 12 12:40:03 2014, Roman Gredig, DRS eval bord v5 Timing
|
Dear Stefan
I have two questions concerning the best time resolution with the DRS V5 eval board.
|
|
Thu Jun 12 12:46:00 2014, Stefan Ritt, DRS eval bord v5 Timing
|
> a) Calibration:
> I am using 4 boards daisy chained. To achieve optimal time resolution I did first a voltage calibration and right afterwards a time calibration. For
all
|
|
Tue May 27 13:46:18 2014, Dominik Neise, Spikes in DRS4 data on custom baord.
|
We see quite some spikes in our DRS4 sampled data in FACT. We see different types of spikes:
single cell spikes, usually showing a large amplitude of 200mV
double cell spikes, usually only in the order of 20mV.
Even triple and quadro cell spikes are rarely seen.
The double cell spikes often occur as symmetrical double cell spikes mirrored |
|
Tue May 27 16:07:17 2014, Stefan Ritt, Spikes in DRS4 data on custom baord.
|
Dominik Neise wrote:
We see quite some spikes in our DRS4 sampled data in FACT. We see different types of spikes: |
|
Fri May 16 14:04:47 2014, Benjamin LeGeyt, simultaneous writing and reading with region of interest mode?
|
Hello!
We're developing electronics based on the DRS4 to read out a breast PET scanner and our event rate will be quite high so we're concerned about
dead-time. with that in mind, I have a question regarding the mode of simultaneous writing and reading that is described in the DRS4 data sheet. |
|
Mon May 19 08:04:57 2014, Stefan Ritt, simultaneous writing and reading with region of interest mode?
|
Benjamin LeGeyt wrote:
Hello! |
|
Tue Apr 15 18:35:41 2014, Carlo Stella, drs_exam project fail to compile
|
Hi,
when I try to compile drs_exam project my computer give me this output:
|
|
Wed Apr 16 08:20:36 2014, Stefan Ritt, drs_exam project fail to compile
|
Carlo Stella wrote:
Hi, |
|
Thu Apr 24 23:03:25 2014, Carlo Stella, drs_exam project fail to compile
|
Stefan Ritt wrote:
|
|
Thu Apr 17 12:02:28 2014, Wang , The first channel is wrong.
|
Hi,
I want to describe this phenomenon again. The diagram |
|
Thu Apr 10 14:45:12 2014, Roman Gredig, DRS4 Evalboard V5 with Windows7Pro64bit
|
Dear Stefan
|
|
Wed Apr 16 10:24:55 2014, Stefan Ritt, DRS4 Evalboard V5 with Windows7Pro64bit
|
>
> Dear Stefan
>
|
|
Wed Apr 16 03:22:43 2014, Wang , why is the first channel output error?
|
Hi,
|
|
Wed Apr 16 08:30:32 2014, Stefan Ritt, why is the first channel output error?
|
Wang wrote:
Hi, |
|
Wed Mar 5 21:54:13 2014, Hermann-Josef Mathes, Software drs-5.0.0 fails to compile (drsosc)
|
Hi,
the latest software drs-5.0.0.tar.gz fails to compile on my freshly installed SuSE 13.1 whereas the previous 4.0.1 is compiling out-of-the-box.
|
|
Thu Mar 6 11:12:44 2014, Stefan Ritt, Software drs-5.0.0 fails to compile (drsosc)
|
Hermann-Josef Mathes wrote:
Hi, |
|
Wed Aug 7 15:05:59 2013, Hermann-Josef Mathes, Repeated time calibration
|
Hi,
is there any (obvious) reason why it is not possible (or not indended) to repeat the time calibration of a DRS4 eval board several times. I get |
|
Wed Aug 7 15:10:57 2013, Stefan Ritt, Repeated time calibration
|
Hermann-Josef Mathes wrote:
Hi, |
|
Wed Aug 7 15:20:33 2013, Hermann-Josef Mathes, Repeated time calibration
|
Stefan Ritt wrote:
|
|
Wed Feb 5 13:41:42 2014, Stefan Ritt, Repeated time calibration
|
Hermann-Josef Mathes wrote:
Hi Stefan, |
|
Wed May 8 06:07:52 2013, Andrey Kuznetsov, DRS4 v2.0 Eval Board running on higher versions of DRS Oscilloscope program
|
Hi,
I have an old v2.0 board that I just upgraded firmware on using v4.0.0 download package which has a drs4_eval1.bit for v2.0 boards containing firmware
15158. So I would like to use the latest DRS Oscilloscope program, due to the faster acquisition speeds and advanced calibration techniques, however I |
|
Wed May 8 19:50:01 2013, Andrey Kuznetsov, DRS4 installation on Windows 8 issues
|
I'm also having trouble installing drivers and running DRSOsc program on another computer running Windows 8.
The issue with the driver is that it's not digitally signed. |
|
Wed Jan 15 17:37:21 2014, Stefan Ritt, DRS4 installation on Windows 8 issues
|
Andrey Kuznetsov wrote:
I'm also having trouble installing drivers and running DRSOsc program |
|
Wed Jan 15 17:34:55 2014, Stefan Ritt, DRS4 v2.0 Eval Board running on higher versions of DRS Oscilloscope program
|
Andrey Kuznetsov wrote:
Hi, |
|
Wed Aug 28 13:07:51 2013, Andrey Kuznetsov, Some bug fixes and questions
|
For http://www.psi.ch/drs/DocumentationEN/manual_rev20.pdf:
0 0x02 15..8 board_type 5 for DRS4 USB Evaluation Board 1.1 ---> should instead say Evaluation Board 2.0 ?
I've been reviewing DRS.cpp v4.0.1 |
|
Thu Sep 5 10:01:00 2013, Andrey Kuznetsov, Some bug fixes and questions
|
#11 0x080589de in DRSBoard::GetWave (this=0xb7456008, chipIndex=0, channel=0 '\000', waveform=0x40f24000, responseCalib=true, triggerCell=207, wsr=0,
adjustToClock=false, threshold=1, offsetCalib=true) at src/DRS.cpp:3380
This is calling: |
|
Mon Sep 9 06:49:36 2013, Andrey Kuznetsov, Some bug fixes and questions
|
| The DRSCallback *pcb is missing an if statement in the code when DRS Oscilloscope software isn't used when calibrating in function: int DRSBoard::CalibrateTiming(DRSCallback *pcb) |
|
Wed Jan 15 17:11:14 2014, Stefan Ritt, Some bug fixes and questions
|
Andrey Kuznetsov wrote:
The DRSCallback *pcb is missing an if statement in the code when DRS Oscilloscope software |
|
Wed Jan 15 17:02:58 2014, Stefan Ritt, Some bug fixes and questions
|
Andrey Kuznetsov wrote:
So although it doesn't affect data retrieval, it's just dumb luck the function ends up being called |
|
Wed Jan 15 16:15:00 2014, Stefan Ritt, Some bug fixes and questions
|
Andrey Kuznetsov wrote:
For http://www.psi.ch/drs/DocumentationEN/manual_rev20.pdf: |